NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Neville, Bernard W. – Small Group Behavior, 1978
This study is necessarily exploratory with regard to action-oriented dimensions in educational contexts. Author hypothesizes that those subjects rated most highly functioning on selected dimensions will be rated as making the most significant contribution to learning of other group members. Those rated least effective will be least helpful in…
Descriptors: Emotional Response, Group Dynamics, Interpersonal Competence, Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schultz, Beatrice – Small Group Behavior, 1980
Investigates effectiveness of communicative variables for predicting leadership emergence in long-term, nonlaboratory groups. Concludes that leadership prediction is possible based on group's ratings of selected communicative functions. Group sensitivity to communicative functions at initial session allows for potential group leader selection.…
Descriptors: Communications, Group Dynamics, Individual Characteristics, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lundgren, David C. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The current study analyses developmental trends in sensitivity training groups by exploring the sequence of interpersonal issues or problem areas which emerge at different periods in the life span of such groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carlson, Rose Marie; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1981
Studied male psychiatric patients' social sensitivity and self-awareness in a human relations training program. The two variables were significantly related. Self- awareness was not related to group acceptance. Results indicate a decrease in patient's symptoms but not as a function of social sensitivity or self-awareness. (JAC)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Interpersonal Competence, Patients
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koffmann, Andrew; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1978
The relationship between social skills and group psychotherapy is assessed. No evidence is found that high or low socially skilled subjects differ in verbal behavior in analogue groups. No evidence was found correlating overall adjustment and group participation. (MFD)
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lakin, Martin; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Analyzed interaction and emotional atmosphere categories of interactions among old and young participants in support-discussion groups. The groups differed in frequencies of boundary, self-disclosure, and support behaviors, with the elderly exceeding the young on the first two and the young exceeding the elderly on the third. The young showed…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Emotional Response, Group Dynamics, Helping Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lundgren, David C. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The present study, looking at seven t-groups, examines relationships between members' interpersonal needs for control and affection, on the one hand, and their evaluative attitudes toward the trainer and the group as a whole, on the other, at early and later time points in the course of group formation. (Author)
Descriptors: Affection, Evaluation Criteria, Group Dynamics, Individual Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hurley, John R.; Bennett, Marsha K. – Small Group Behavior, 1988
Explored associations of mutual eye contact with self-accepting and other-accepting conduct by small group members as assessed by pooled group peers and self. Results indicated robust and substantial connections between interpersonal behaviors representing the nonverbal and verbal domains despite rather limited reliability of mutual eye contact…
Descriptors: College Students, Eye Contact, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Steven R.; Rothenberg, Albert – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This paper uses the Interpersonal Perception Method (IPM) to analyze a single episode in a group's experience. The authors feel that such an approach is much more useful than the more usual trait analysis in understanding those experiences which will mediate the group's functioning. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Individual Characteristics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beck, John E. – Small Group Behavior, 1987
Examined changes in individual construing processes for students in British institutes of higher learning, with reference to T-group or experiential learning group outcomes. Found little support for hypotheses that predict consistent positive change in participants' construct systems. Suggests that some participants developed greater interpersonal…
Descriptors: Change, Cognitive Style, College Students, Experiential Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shoemaker, Gary – Small Group Behavior, 1987
Assessed group leaders' styles and predicted outcomes in five human relations training groups. Assessed participants' gains from changes in self-esteem and social sensitivity. Results showed two distinct types of group experience. Findings suggest that focus of intervention and pattern of communication among members can have significant effect on…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Dynamics, Group Experience, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Neville, Bernie W. – Small Group Behavior, 1983
Contrasted high-functioning and low-functioning persons in small groups using two studies based on Carkhuff's and Maslow's models of effective functioning. Results revealed high-functioning persons perceived interpersonal effectiveness as a Gestalt; low-functioning persons perceived interpersonal dimension operating independently. (JAC)
Descriptors: Adults, Discussion Groups, Foreign Countries, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Poole, M. Scott; Folger, Joseph P. – Small Group Behavior, 1981
Attempts to clarify the epistemological basis of interaction analysis by exploring the modes of observation researchers adopt when using interaction coding schemes and outlining the validation requirements these options entail. Modes of observation include the viewpoint of the experiencer, the process of experiencing, and what is experienced. (JAC)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence