Descriptor
Group Behavior | 4 |
Performance Factors | 4 |
College Students | 3 |
Group Dynamics | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Sex Differences | 2 |
Ability | 1 |
Behavioral Objectives | 1 |
Communication (Thought… | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Small Group Behavior | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Israel | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Tziner, Aharon E. – Small Group Behavior, 1988
Varied composition of three-man military teams (N=64) by assigning members according to team composition in all possible combinations of ability and motivation. Found both ability and motivation had an additive effect on crew performance, thus leading to conclusion that when teams perform highly interdependent tasks, performance is apparently…
Descriptors: Ability, Foreign Countries, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics

Mabry, Edward A. – Small Group Behavior, 1985
Examined whether gender composition and task structure affect communicative behavior in small groups. Groups with different numbers of men and women were given a highly structured assignment and a human relations case study. Interaction process analysis supported the hypothesis only for dominance acts of giving suggestions. (BH)
Descriptors: College Students, Communication (Thought Transfer), Group Behavior, Group Dynamics

Lane, Irving M.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1982
Examined if making group goals of decision acceptance and quality explicit versus leaving them unstated would influence the decision-making effectiveness of male and female interacting groups. Explicitly stating that group members should strive for acceptance increased group decision-making quality and increased individual acceptance of the group…
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Decision Making

Shaw, Marvin, E.; Webb, Jeaninne N. – Small Group Behavior, 1982
Examined whether compatible groups facilitate learning more than incompatible groups. Used peer groups to facilitate learning in college courses. Computed compatibility scores for pairs and four-person groups working together. Used examinations to measure peer group procedure effectiveness. Results did not indicate a positive relationship between…
Descriptors: College Students, Group Behavior, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), Higher Education