NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kegan, Daniel L. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Describes a research project examining non-professional knowledge of and attitudes to sensitivity training groups. A questionnaire was distributed to college students, police officers and members of a group dynamics class. Results indicate that all three groups had fairly positive attitudes towards sensitivity training. (NG)
Descriptors: College Students, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lundgren, David C.; Knight, David J. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines the role of interpersonal needs for control and affection in influencing members' attitudinal reactions to the trainer and the group. Results indicate no support for the two-stage, authority-intimacy sequence suggested by much of the research on group development. (Author)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Helping Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Steven R.; Rothenberg, Albert – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This paper uses the Interpersonal Perception Method (IPM) to analyze a single episode in a group's experience. The authors feel that such an approach is much more useful than the more usual trait analysis in understanding those experiences which will mediate the group's functioning. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Individual Characteristics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wogan, Michael; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Tests the hypothesis that cognitive-experiential pretraining is beneficial in promoting openness and honesty among members of a psychotherapy group. The hypothesis is supported. (HMV)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Katz, Stephen I.; Schwebel, Andrew I. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This study was designed to compare the effects of residential and nonresidential laboratories in transfer of training. Subjects were middle-level managers. The results indicated no differences in transfer in the two groups. Both groups underwent substantial changes in their perspective on work problems and in their use of work-related skills. (NG)
Descriptors: Environmental Influences, Group Dynamics, Group Norms, Human Relations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hipple, John L. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Investigates effects of human relations laboratory experiences on interpersonal behavior of college students. Subjects were 79 college students. Results indicate participation in human relations training laboratories does have an effect on self-perception and behavior. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, College Students, Human Relations, Individual Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This research is based on the premise that sensitivity training effects are explicable in terms of processes of social influence. Subjects were participants in a residential 5-day training laboratory. Results indicated that no single strong source of influence could be discerned. Implications are discussed. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Identification (Psychology), Interaction Process Analysis, Research Projects