Descriptor
Source
Small Group Behavior | 7 |
Author
Brown, Steven R. | 1 |
Hipple, John L. | 1 |
Katz, Stephen I. | 1 |
Kegan, Daniel L. | 1 |
Knight, David J. | 1 |
Lundgren, David C. | 1 |
Rothenberg, Albert | 1 |
Schwebel, Andrew I. | 1 |
Smith, Peter B. | 1 |
Wogan, Michael | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Kegan, Daniel L. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Describes a research project examining non-professional knowledge of and attitudes to sensitivity training groups. A questionnaire was distributed to college students, police officers and members of a group dynamics class. Results indicate that all three groups had fairly positive attitudes towards sensitivity training. (NG)
Descriptors: College Students, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis

Lundgren, David C.; Knight, David J. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines the role of interpersonal needs for control and affection in influencing members' attitudinal reactions to the trainer and the group. Results indicate no support for the two-stage, authority-intimacy sequence suggested by much of the research on group development. (Author)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Helping Relationship

Brown, Steven R.; Rothenberg, Albert – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This paper uses the Interpersonal Perception Method (IPM) to analyze a single episode in a group's experience. The authors feel that such an approach is much more useful than the more usual trait analysis in understanding those experiences which will mediate the group's functioning. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Individual Characteristics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence

Wogan, Michael; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Tests the hypothesis that cognitive-experiential pretraining is beneficial in promoting openness and honesty among members of a psychotherapy group. The hypothesis is supported. (HMV)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Group Behavior

Katz, Stephen I.; Schwebel, Andrew I. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This study was designed to compare the effects of residential and nonresidential laboratories in transfer of training. Subjects were middle-level managers. The results indicated no differences in transfer in the two groups. Both groups underwent substantial changes in their perspective on work problems and in their use of work-related skills. (NG)
Descriptors: Environmental Influences, Group Dynamics, Group Norms, Human Relations

Hipple, John L. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Investigates effects of human relations laboratory experiences on interpersonal behavior of college students. Subjects were 79 college students. Results indicate participation in human relations training laboratories does have an effect on self-perception and behavior. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, College Students, Human Relations, Individual Development

Smith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This research is based on the premise that sensitivity training effects are explicable in terms of processes of social influence. Subjects were participants in a residential 5-day training laboratory. Results indicated that no single strong source of influence could be discerned. Implications are discussed. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Identification (Psychology), Interaction Process Analysis, Research Projects