NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 27 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Data show three patterns of response to the sensitivity training experience, an enhanced rate of change in some opposite sex relationships, more satisfaction with various types of elders, and dissatisfaction coupled with a possibly declining rate of change among same-sex work equals. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Therapy, Groups, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reddy, W. Brendan; Beers, Thomas – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Explores the dimensions of self-concept in response to sensitivity training, i.e., that psychologically healthy participants would make greater gains in self-actualization than would those participants who viewed themselves as less healthy. Results support the hypothesis. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Research Projects, Self Actualization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weinstein, Malcolm S.; Hanson, Robert – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This study is an initial report in a research program to examine the nature and influence of one set of structural variables--participation patterns--on patterns of interaction in sensitivity training groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Experience, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lundgren, David C. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The current study analyses developmental trends in sensitivity training groups by exploring the sequence of interpersonal issues or problem areas which emerge at different periods in the life span of such groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
O'Day, Rory – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This report focuses on differences in training style among four trainers as measured by the Training Style Scoring System. The study concludes that supportive and trusting interrelations between members develop when the leader permits open expression of hostility toward his/herself. The difficulty of allowing this is noted. (NG)
Descriptors: Classification, Group Experience, Individual Differences, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mangham, Iain – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Presents a model of interaction and considers the implications of part of that model for intervention processes in T-group training. (Author)
Descriptors: Feedback, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fisher, B. Aubrey – Small Group Behavior, 1979
Provides an insight into the group process of therapy and compares and contrasts the T-group process with therapy group process. The here-and-now orientation was present in T-group and therapy-group interaction. Greater relational conflict was present in the T-group. Members of the therapy group were much more defensive than members of the…
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Communication (Thought Transfer), Conflict, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Desmond, Richard E.; Seligman, Milton – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Analyzes research studies of leaderless groups in terms of specific variables which seem to be important for each study. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Group Therapy, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker, David N. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The nonverbal touching behavior of strangers in a dyadic interaction was studied to assess the current controversy between encounter group trainers and their critics concerning the use of nonverbal touching exercises to foster interpersonal openness. (Author)
Descriptors: Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Nonverbal Communication, Physical Activities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Peter B. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This research is based on the premise that sensitivity training effects are explicable in terms of processes of social influence. Subjects were participants in a residential 5-day training laboratory. Results indicated that no single strong source of influence could be discerned. Implications are discussed. (NG)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Identification (Psychology), Interaction Process Analysis, Research Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Klemke, Lloyd W. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This paper focuses on how the sociological perspective can make significant contributions in providing a meaningful conceptual framework for analyzing self concept changes. Insight in explaining why only certain kinds of limited changes typically occur among sensitivity group participants is presented. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Group Discussion, Group Experience, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Freundlich, David – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Defines and explains the difference of marathon groups and psychotherapy. (HMV)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Therapy, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kegan, Daniel L. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Describes a research project examining non-professional knowledge of and attitudes to sensitivity training groups. A questionnaire was distributed to college students, police officers and members of a group dynamics class. Results indicate that all three groups had fairly positive attitudes towards sensitivity training. (NG)
Descriptors: College Students, Group Dynamics, Higher Education, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hill, W. Fawcett – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Essentially, the HIM is a systematic set of categories developed for use in understanding and classifying interaction in small groups, especially therapy groups. It has, however, been used not only on T-groups, encounter groups, discussion groups, and such, but also on individual and dyadic counseling sessions. (Author)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Classification, Conceptual Schemes, Group Dynamics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Conyne, Robert K.; Rapin, Lynn S. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Compares the relative effectiveness of facilitator-directed (FD) and self-directed (SD) programmed treatments on the same participants. The programmed treatments were tested for their capacity to induce change in the quality of group member verbal interaction, and for their differential semantic meaning. Results are inconclusive. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Counseling Effectiveness, Graduate Students, Group Dynamics
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2