NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Weinstein, Malcolm S.; Hanson, Robert – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This study is an initial report in a research program to examine the nature and influence of one set of structural variables--participation patterns--on patterns of interaction in sensitivity training groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Experience, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bales, Robert R. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
The four papers presented here include a study of group communication process among college students, a developmental analysis of social interaction, an analysis of environmental impact on interaction, and a methodological discussion of ways of studying interaction. These papers are followed by series of three discussion papers. (PS)
Descriptors: Conferences, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williams, J. Sherwood; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This article examines the idea that social norms are not permanently incorporated into a person's personality. The author presents the argument that in a group situation subjects are conditioned toward similarity while afterward, the individual's behavior gradually returns to an "operant level". Tests show this argument to be essentially true.…
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Conditioning, Group Dynamics, Group Norms
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Reddy, W. Brendan – Small Group Behavior, 1975
This article describes a study done to compare, quantitatively and qualitatively, the problem-solving and decision-making performance of four populations: business administration students, middle managers, elementary school teachers and elementary and secondary school principals. Results show business administration students and middle managers…
Descriptors: Administrators, Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walker, David N. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The nonverbal touching behavior of strangers in a dyadic interaction was studied to assess the current controversy between encounter group trainers and their critics concerning the use of nonverbal touching exercises to foster interpersonal openness. (Author)
Descriptors: Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship, Nonverbal Communication, Physical Activities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dyson, James W.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1976
This paper reports on the relationships between group composition, leadership and decisions through a study of small groups engaged in preferential bargaining about problems with open solution sets. The relationships were analyzed and can be compared best against the background of traditional approaches. (Author)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Group Dynamics, Group Unity, Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shapiro, Ben Zion – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines some of the conditions associated with dissolution of the friendship tie. Subjects were 232 boys and girls between the ages of eight and 15 at a summer camp. The hypothesis that reduction in social interaction would be associated with increased probability of dissolution was not conclusively supported. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, Friendship, Interaction Process Analysis, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Horenstein, David; Gilbert, Shirley J. – Small Group Behavior, 1976
Investigates whether self-disclosure elicits anxiety and subsequent coping attempts in subjects who interact with a direct, open and disclosing communicator. Subjects were 40 male and 40 female college students. Results indicate direct and open communication does elicit some degree of anxiety in the listener. (Author)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Behavioral Science Research, Communication (Thought Transfer), Helping Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Adelson, Joseph P. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The role of feedback in T-groups was studied. Results indicate that feedback increases as T-groups progress, feedback is more emotional and non-evaluative than cognitive in nature, positive and direct feedback to the leaders increases as the group develops, and specific feedback between members increases as groups progress. (SE)
Descriptors: Behavior Patterns, College Students, Feedback, Group Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Herman W. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines age differences in social interaction. Subjects range in age from five to 20. Results indicate female groups develop towards adult interpersonal behavior styles earlier than male groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Language, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis