NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nydegger, Rudy V. – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the differential application of reinforcing and punishing light cues in the manipulation of verbal behavior and leadership status in small groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Feedback, Group Dynamics, Leadership
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harvey, Virginia; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The FIRO-B by Schutz and the Personal Orientation Inventory by Shostrum were used to assess personality changes in a verbal and a nonverbal T-group. Personality measures used failed to find significant posttreatment differences between groups. Several significant differences occurred within groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Attitudes, Communication (Thought Transfer), Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bradley, Patricia Hayes – Small Group Behavior, 1978
This study suggests female and male verbal behavior should be viewed separately when analysing task-importance. Ego-involvement works with task importance to create atmospheres of maximum involvement. Characteristics of communication and group pressure for uniformity are identified. (MFD)
Descriptors: Conformity, Group Behavior, Group Dynamics, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bochner, Arthur P.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1975
The willingness to manipulate others has been called Machiavellianism. The purpose of the present study was to acquire a preliminary answer to the question: what verbal communicative strategies do people with high Machiavellian characteristics employ which permit them to influence and control the group process? (Author)
Descriptors: Behavior, Communication (Thought Transfer), Group Dynamics, Individual Power
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Conyne, Robert K.; Rapin, Lynn S. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
This study compared the effectiveness of facilitator-directed and self-directed personal growth group treatments toward inducing therapeutic verbal interaction. An interaction process analysis approach, the Hill Interaction Matrix (HIM) statement-by-statement system, was used to examine treatment differences. (Author)
Descriptors: Graduate Students, Group Dynamics, Interaction Process Analysis, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pattinson, Pamela R.; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1977
The present study examines the effects of immediate feedback to the therapist. It was hypothesized that immediate feedback would increase the amount of therapeutic talk by the therapist, as defined by the HIM. (Author)
Descriptors: Feedback, Group Behavior, Health Personnel, Helping Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Herman W. – Small Group Behavior, 1977
Examines age differences in social interaction. Subjects range in age from five to 20. Results indicate female groups develop towards adult interpersonal behavior styles earlier than male groups. (Author)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Child Language, Individual Development, Interaction Process Analysis