Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Sampling | 3 |
| Statistical Inference | 3 |
| Bias | 2 |
| Monte Carlo Methods | 2 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Educational Indicators | 1 |
| Equal Education | 1 |
| Equations (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Error Correction | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Income | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Sociological Methods &… | 3 |
Author
| Cameron, Christopher J. | 1 |
| Encarnación Álvarez-Verdejo | 1 |
| Heckathorn, Douglas D. | 1 |
| Juan F. Muñoz | 1 |
| Mazza, Angelo | 1 |
| Pablo J. Moya-Fernández | 1 |
| Punzo, Antonio | 1 |
| Shi, Yongren | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Juan F. Muñoz; Pablo J. Moya-Fernández; Encarnación Álvarez-Verdejo – Sociological Methods & Research, 2025
The Gini index is probably the most commonly used indicator to measure inequality. For continuous distributions, the Gini index can be computed using several equivalent formulations. However, this is not the case with discrete distributions, where controversy remains regarding the expression to be used to estimate the Gini index. We attempt to…
Descriptors: Bias, Educational Indicators, Equal Education, Monte Carlo Methods
Shi, Yongren; Cameron, Christopher J.; Heckathorn, Douglas D. – Sociological Methods & Research, 2019
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS), a link-tracing sampling and inference method for studying hard-to-reach populations, has been shown to produce asymptotically unbiased population estimates when its assumptions are satisfied. However, some of the assumptions are prohibitively difficult to reach in the field, and the violation of a crucial…
Descriptors: Statistical Inference, Bias, Recruitment, Sampling
Mazza, Angelo; Punzo, Antonio – Sociological Methods & Research, 2015
The dissimilarity index of Duncan and Duncan is widely used in a broad range of contexts to assess the overall extent of segregation in the allocation of two groups in two or more units. Its sensitivity to random allocation implies an upward bias with respect to the unknown amount of systematic segregation. In this article, following a multinomial…
Descriptors: Statistical Bias, Error of Measurement, Error Correction, Mathematical Logic

Peer reviewed
Direct link
