Publication Date
In 2025 | 8 |
Since 2024 | 43 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 50 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 50 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 134 |
Descriptor
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 141 |
Author
Chunhua Cao | 3 |
Enders, Craig K. | 3 |
Finch, W. Holmes | 3 |
Grimm, Kevin J. | 3 |
Jackson, Dennis L. | 3 |
Lanza, Stephanie T. | 3 |
Marsh, Herbert W. | 3 |
Martin Hecht | 3 |
Steffen Zitzmann | 3 |
Anguiano-Carrasco, Cristina | 2 |
Bang Quan Zheng | 2 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 141 |
Reports - Research | 141 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 6 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Grade 1 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
High Schools | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Small sample sizes pose a severe threat to convergence and accuracy of between-group level parameter estimates in multilevel structural equation modeling (SEM). However, in certain situations, such as pilot studies or when populations are inherently small, increasing samples sizes is not feasible. As a remedy, we propose a two-stage regularized…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Structural Equation Models, Matrices
Philipp Sterner; Florian Pargent; Dominik Deffner; David Goretzko – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Measurement invariance (MI) describes the equivalence of measurement models of a construct across groups or time. When comparing latent means, MI is often stated as a prerequisite of meaningful group comparisons. The most common way to investigate MI is multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA). Although numerous guides exist, a recent…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Causal Models, Measurement, Predictor Variables
Walter P. Vispoel; Hyeryung Lee; Hyeri Hong – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
We demonstrate how to analyze complete multivariate generalizability theory (GT) designs within structural equation modeling frameworks that encompass both individual subscale scores and composites formed from those scores. Results from numerous analyses of observed scores obtained from respondents who completed the recently updated form of the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Multivariate Analysis, Generalizability Theory, College Students
Jinying Ouyang; Zhehan Jiang; Christine DiStefano; Junhao Pan; Yuting Han; Lingling Xu; Dexin Shi; Fen Cai – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Precisely estimating factor scores is challenging, especially when models are mis-specified. Stemming from network analysis, centrality measures offer an alternative approach to estimating the scores. Using a two-fold simulation design with varying availability of a priori theoretical knowledge, this study implemented hybrid centrality to estimate…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Network Analysis, Scores
Russell P. Houpt; Kevin J. Grimm; Aaron T. McLaughlin; Daryl R. Van Tongeren – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Numerous methods exist to determine the optimal number of classes when using latent profile analysis (LPA), but none are consistently correct. Recently, the likelihood incremental percentage per parameter (LI3P) was proposed as a model effect-size measure. To evaluate the LI3P more thoroughly, we simulated 50,000 datasets, manipulating factors…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Profiles, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Guangjian Zhang; Lauren A. Trichtinger; Dayoung Lee; Ge Jiang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Many applications of structural equation modeling involve ordinal (e.g., Likert) variables. A popular way of dealing with ordinal variables is to estimate the model with polychoric correlations rather than Pearson correlations. Such an estimation also requires the asymptotic covariance matrix of polychoric correlations. It is computationally…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Predictor Variables, Correlation, Computation
A. R. Georgeson – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
There is increasing interest in using factor scores in structural equation models and there have been numerous methodological papers on the topic. Nevertheless, sum scores, which are computed from adding up item responses, continue to be ubiquitous in practice. It is therefore important to compare simulation results involving factor scores to…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Scores, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias
Ming-Chi Tseng – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
This study aims to estimate the latent interaction effect in the CLPM model through a two-step multiple imputation analysis. The estimation of within x within and between x within latent interaction under the CLPM model framework is compared between the one-step Bayesian LMS method and the two-step multiple imputation analysis through a simulation…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Bayesian Statistics, Self Esteem, Depression (Psychology)
Naoto Yamashita – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Matrix decomposition structural equation modeling (MDSEM) is introduced as a novel approach in structural equation modeling, contrasting with traditional structural equation modeling (SEM). MDSEM approximates the data matrix using a model generated by the hypothetical model and addresses limitations faced by conventional SEM procedures by…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Structure, Robustness (Statistics), Matrices
Keke Lai – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
When a researcher proposes an SEM model to explain the dynamics among some latent variables, the real question in model evaluation is the fit of the model's structural part. A composite index that lumps the fit of the structural part and measurement part does not directly address that question. The need for more attention to structural-level fit…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Statistics, Statistical Distributions
Ismail Cuhadar; Ömür Kaya Kalkan – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Simulation studies are needed to investigate how many score categories are sufficient to treat ordered categorical data as continuous, particularly for bifactor models. The current simulation study aims to address such needs by investigating the performance of estimation methods in the bifactor models with ordered categorical data. Results support…
Descriptors: Predictor Variables, Structural Equation Models, Sample Size, Evaluation Methods
Timothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Within the frequentist structural equation modeling (SEM) framework, adjudicating model quality through measures of fit has been an active area of methodological research. Complicating this conversation is research revealing that a higher quality measurement portion of a SEM can result in poorer estimates of overall model fit than lower quality…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Reliability, Bayesian Statistics, Goodness of Fit
Leonidas Sakalauskas; Vytautas Dulskis; Darius Plikynas – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Dynamic structural equation models (DSEM) are designed for time series analysis of latent structures. Inherent to the application of DSEM is model parameter estimation, which has to be addressed in many applications by a single time series. In this context, however, the methods currently available either lack estimation quality or are…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Time Management, Predictive Measurement, Data Collection
Njål Foldnes; Jonas Moss; Steffen Grønneberg – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
We propose new ways of robustifying goodness-of-fit tests for structural equation modeling under non-normality. These test statistics have limit distributions characterized by eigenvalues whose estimates are highly unstable and biased in known directions. To take this into account, we design model-based trend predictions to approximate the…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Robustness (Statistics), Prediction
Tenko Raykov; Christine DiStefano; Natalja Menold – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This article is concerned with the assumption of linear temporal development that is often advanced in structural equation modeling-based longitudinal research. The linearity hypothesis is implemented in particular in the popular intercept-and-slope model as well as in more general models containing it as a component, such as longitudinal…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Hypothesis Testing, Longitudinal Studies, Research Methodology