NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 13 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Small sample sizes pose a severe threat to convergence and accuracy of between-group level parameter estimates in multilevel structural equation modeling (SEM). However, in certain situations, such as pilot studies or when populations are inherently small, increasing samples sizes is not feasible. As a remedy, we propose a two-stage regularized…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Structural Equation Models, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Naoto Yamashita – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Matrix decomposition structural equation modeling (MDSEM) is introduced as a novel approach in structural equation modeling, contrasting with traditional structural equation modeling (SEM). MDSEM approximates the data matrix using a model generated by the hypothetical model and addresses limitations faced by conventional SEM procedures by…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Structure, Robustness (Statistics), Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Julia-Kim Walther; Martin Hecht; Benjamin Nagengast; Steffen Zitzmann – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
A two-level data set can be structured in either long format (LF) or wide format (WF), and both have corresponding SEM approaches for estimating multilevel models. Intuitively, one might expect these approaches to perform similarly. However, the two data formats yield data matrices with different numbers of columns and rows, and their "cols :…
Descriptors: Data, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Distributions, Matrices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haiyan Liu; Sarah Depaoli; Lydia Marvin – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
The deviance information criterion (DIC) is widely used to select the parsimonious, well-fitting model. We examined how priors impact model complexity (pD) and the DIC for Bayesian CFA. Study 1 compared the empirical distributions of pD and DIC under multivariate (i.e., inverse Wishart) and separation strategy (SS) priors. The former treats the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Goodness of Fit, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tueller, Stephen J.; Drotar, Scott; Lubke, Gitta H. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011
The discrimination between alternative models and the detection of latent classes in the context of latent variable mixture modeling depends on sample size, class separation, and other aspects that are related to power. Prior to a mixture analysis it is useful to investigate model performance in a simulation study that reflects the research…
Descriptors: Simulation, Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Mathematics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mayer, Axel; Steyer, Rolf; Mueller, Horst – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
We present a 3-step approach to defining latent growth components. In the first step, a measurement model with at least 2 indicators for each time point is formulated to identify measurement error variances and obtain latent variables that are purged from measurement error. In the second step, we use contrast matrices to define the latent growth…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Measurement, Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eusebi, Paolo – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
A graphical method is presented for assessing the state of identifiability of the parameters in a linear structural equation model based on the associated directed graph. We do not restrict attention to recursive models. In the recent literature, methods based on graphical models have been presented as a useful tool for assessing the state of…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Graphs, Evaluation Methods, Mathematical Concepts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Song, Hairong; Ferrer, Emilio – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
This article presents a state-space modeling (SSM) technique for fitting process factor analysis models directly to raw data. The Kalman smoother via the expectation-maximization algorithm to obtain maximum likelihood parameter estimates is used. To examine the finite sample properties of the estimates in SSM when common factors are involved, a…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Computation, Mathematics, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Zhiyong; Hamaker, Ellen L.; Nesselroade, John R. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
Four methods for estimating a dynamic factor model, the direct autoregressive factor score (DAFS) model, are evaluated and compared. The first method estimates the DAFS model using a Kalman filter algorithm based on its state space model representation. The second one employs the maximum likelihood estimation method based on the construction of a…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Simulation, Computer Software, Least Squares Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Enders, Craig K.; Tofighi, Davood – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of misspecifying a growth mixture model (GMM) by assuming that Level-1 residual variances are constant across classes, when they do, in fact, vary in each subpopulation. Misspecification produced bias in the within-class growth trajectories and variance components, and estimates were…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Computation, Monte Carlo Methods, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Savalei, Victoria – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
Normal theory maximum likelihood (ML) is by far the most popular estimation and testing method used in structural equation modeling (SEM), and it is the default in most SEM programs. Even though this approach assumes multivariate normality of the data, its use can be justified on the grounds that it is fairly robust to the violations of the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Testing, Factor Analysis, Maximum Likelihood Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beretvas, S. Natasha; Furlow, Carolyn F. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006
Meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MA-SEM) is increasingly being used to assess model-fit for variables' interrelations synthesized across studies. MA-SEM researchers have analyzed synthesized correlation matrices using structural equation modeling (SEM) estimation that is designed for covariance matrices. This can produce incorrect…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Matrices, Statistical Analysis, Synthesis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Asparouhov, Tihomir; Muthen, Bengt – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a frequently used multivariate analysis technique in statistics. Jennrich and Sampson (1966) solved a significant EFA factor loading matrix rotation problem by deriving the direct Quartimin rotation. Jennrich was also the first to develop standard errors for rotated solutions, although these have still not made…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Testing, Factor Analysis, Research Methodology