Publication Date
In 2025 | 3 |
Since 2024 | 4 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Error of Measurement | 6 |
Measurement Techniques | 6 |
Structural Equation Models | 5 |
Factor Analysis | 4 |
Simulation | 4 |
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Scores | 2 |
Validity | 2 |
Affective Behavior | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 6 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Timothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders; Kelvin Afolabi – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Measurement invariance (MI) is an essential part of validity evidence concerned with ensuring that tests function similarly across groups, contexts, and time. Most evaluations of MI involve multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) that assume simple structure. However, recent research has shown that constraining non-target indicators to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Error of Measurement, Validity, Monte Carlo Methods
Philipp Sterner; Kim De Roover; David Goretzko – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
When comparing relations and means of latent variables, it is important to establish measurement invariance (MI). Most methods to assess MI are based on confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Recently, new methods have been developed based on exploratory factor analysis (EFA); most notably, as extensions of multi-group EFA, researchers introduced…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Measurement Techniques, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models
E. Damiano D'Urso; Jesper Tijmstra; Jeroen K. Vermunt; Kim De Roover – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Measurement invariance (MI) is required for validly comparing latent constructs measured by multiple ordinal self-report items. Non-invariances may occur when disregarding (group differences in) an acquiescence response style (ARS; an agreeing tendency regardless of item content). If non-invariance results solely from neglecting ARS, one should…
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Structural Equation Models, Construct Validity, Measurement Techniques
Manuel T. Rein; Jeroen K. Vermunt; Kim De Roover; Leonie V. D. E. Vogelsmeier – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Researchers often study dynamic processes of latent variables in everyday life, such as the interplay of positive and negative affect over time. An intuitive approach is to first estimate the measurement model of the latent variables, then compute factor scores, and finally use these factor scores as observed scores in vector autoregressive…
Descriptors: Measurement Techniques, Factor Analysis, Scores, Validity
Raykov, Tenko; Marcoulides, George A. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
A latent variable modeling approach is outlined that can be used for meta-analysis of reliability coefficients of multicomponent measuring instruments. Important limitations of efforts to combine composite reliability findings across multiple studies are initially pointed out. A reliability synthesis procedure is discussed that is based on…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Reliability, Structural Equation Models, Error of Measurement
Lu, Irene R. R.; Thomas, D. Roland – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
This article considers models involving a single structural equation with latent explanatory and/or latent dependent variables where discrete items are used to measure the latent variables. Our primary focus is the use of scores as proxies for the latent variables and carrying out ordinary least squares (OLS) regression on such scores to estimate…
Descriptors: Least Squares Statistics, Computation, Item Response Theory, Structural Equation Models