Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 4 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 16 |
Descriptor
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 16 |
Author
Jackson, Dennis L. | 2 |
Meade, Adam W. | 2 |
Ahn, Soyeon | 1 |
Alhija, Fadia Nasser-Abu | 1 |
Bang Quan Zheng | 1 |
Bauer, Daniel J. | 1 |
Beauducel, Andre | 1 |
Bentler, Peter M. | 1 |
Chunhua Cao | 1 |
Depaoli, Sarah | 1 |
Diep Nguyen | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 16 |
Reports - Research | 15 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Chunhua Cao; Xinya Liang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Cross-loadings are common in multiple-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) but often ignored in measurement invariance testing. This study examined the impact of ignoring cross-loadings on the sensitivity of fit measures (CFI, RMSEA, SRMR, SRMRu, AIC, BIC, SaBIC, LRT) to measurement noninvariance. The manipulated design factors included the…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Error of Measurement, Sample Size, Factor Analysis
Haiyan Liu; Sarah Depaoli; Lydia Marvin – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
The deviance information criterion (DIC) is widely used to select the parsimonious, well-fitting model. We examined how priors impact model complexity (pD) and the DIC for Bayesian CFA. Study 1 compared the empirical distributions of pD and DIC under multivariate (i.e., inverse Wishart) and separation strategy (SS) priors. The former treats the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Bayesian Statistics, Goodness of Fit, Factor Analysis
Eunsook Kim; Diep Nguyen; Siyu Liu; Yan Wang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Factor mixture modeling (FMM) is generally complex with both unobserved categorical and unobserved continuous variables. We explore the potential of item parceling to reduce the model complexity of FMM and improve convergence and class enumeration accordingly. To this end, we conduct Monte Carlo simulations with three types of data, continuous,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Monte Carlo Methods
Bang Quan Zheng; Peter M. Bentler – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2022
Chi-square tests based on maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of covariance structures often incorrectly over-reject the null hypothesis: [sigma] = [sigma(theta)] when the sample size is small. Reweighted least squares (RLS) avoids this problem. In some models, the vector of parameter must contain means, variances, and covariances, yet whether RLS…
Descriptors: Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit, Sample Size
Myers, Nicholas D.; Ahn, Soyeon; Jin, Ying – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of the number of targets specified on the quality of exploratory factor analysis solutions with a complex underlying structure and incomplete substantive measurement theory. Three Monte Carlo studies were performed based on the ratio of the number of observed variables to the number of…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size, Measurement
Jackson, Dennis L.; Voth, Jennifer; Frey, Marc P. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Determining an appropriate sample size for use in latent variable modeling techniques has presented ongoing challenges to researchers. In particular, small sample sizes are known to present concerns over sampling error for the variances and covariances on which model estimation is based, as well as for fit indexes and convergence failures. The…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Factor Analysis, Measurement, Models
Tong, Xiaoxiao; Bentler, Peter M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Recently a new mean scaled and skewness adjusted test statistic was developed for evaluating structural equation models in small samples and with potentially nonnormal data, but this statistic has received only limited evaluation. The performance of this statistic is compared to normal theory maximum likelihood and 2 well-known robust test…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Robustness (Statistics), Sample Size
Moshagen, Morten – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
The size of a model has been shown to critically affect the goodness of approximation of the model fit statistic "T" to the asymptotic chi-square distribution in finite samples. It is not clear, however, whether this "model size effect" is a function of the number of manifest variables, the number of free parameters, or both. It is demonstrated by…
Descriptors: Goodness of Fit, Structural Equation Models, Statistical Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods
Depaoli, Sarah – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Parameter recovery was assessed within mixture confirmatory factor analysis across multiple estimator conditions under different simulated levels of mixture class separation. Mixture class separation was defined in the measurement model (through factor loadings) and the structural model (through factor variances). Maximum likelihood (ML) via the…
Descriptors: Markov Processes, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias, Evaluation Research
Johnson, Emily C.; Meade, Adam W.; DuVernet, Amy M. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
Confirmatory factor analytic tests of measurement invariance (MI) require a referent indicator (RI) for model identification. Although the assumption that the RI is perfectly invariant across groups is acknowledged as problematic, the literature provides relatively little guidance for researchers to identify the conditions under which the practice…
Descriptors: Measurement, Validity, Factor Analysis, Models
Meade, Adam W.; Bauer, Daniel J. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
This study investigates the effects of sample size, factor overdetermination, and communality on the precision of factor loading estimates and the power of the likelihood ratio test of factorial invariance in multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Although sample sizes are typically thought to be the primary determinant of precision and power,…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Factor Structure, Factor Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Jackson, Dennis L. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
Some authors have suggested that sample size in covariance structure modeling should be considered in the context of how many parameters are to be estimated (e.g., Kline, 2005). Previous research has examined the effect of varying sample size relative to the number of parameters being estimated (N:q). Although some support has been found for this…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Goodness of Fit
Beauducel, Andre; Herzberg, Philipp Yorck – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006
This simulation study compared maximum likelihood (ML) estimation with weighted least squares means and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimation. The study was based on confirmatory factor analyses with 1, 2, 4, and 8 factors, based on 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 cases, and on 5, 10, 20, and 40 variables with 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 categories. There was no…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Classification, Sample Size
Zhang, Duan; Willson, Victor L. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006
Both structural equation models and hierarchical linear models (HLMs) have been commonly used in multilevel analysis. This study utilized simulated data to investigate the power difference among 3 multilevel models: HLM, deviation structural equation models, and a hybrid approach of HLM and structural equation models. Two factors were examined:…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Interaction, Simulation
Alhija, Fadia Nasser-Abu; Wisenbaker, Joseph – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2006
A simulation study was conducted to examine the effect of item parceling on confirmatory factor analysis parameter estimates and their standard errors at different levels of sample size, number of indicators per factor, size of factor structure/pattern coefficients, magnitude of interfactor correlations, and variations in item-level data…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Computation, Factor Analysis, Sample Size
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2