Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
Structural Equation Modeling:… | 10 |
Author
Bo Zhang | 1 |
Boomsma, Anne | 1 |
Bray, Bethany C. | 1 |
Castro-Schilo, Laura | 1 |
Depaoli, Sarah | 1 |
Don C. Zhang | 1 |
Elizabeth A. Sanders | 1 |
Enders, Craig K. | 1 |
Forero, Carlos G. | 1 |
Gallardo-Pujol, David | 1 |
Grimm, Kevin J. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 1 | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Center for Epidemiologic… | 1 |
Child Behavior Checklist | 1 |
Early Childhood Longitudinal… | 1 |
National Longitudinal Study… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bo Zhang; Jing Luo; Susu Zhang; Tianjun Sun; Don C. Zhang – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
Oblique bifactor models, where group factors are allowed to correlate with one another, are commonly used. However, the lack of research on the statistical properties of oblique bifactor models renders the statistical validity of empirical findings questionable. Therefore, the present study took the first step to examine the statistical properties…
Descriptors: Correlation, Predictor Variables, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Bias
Timothy R. Konold; Elizabeth A. Sanders; Kelvin Afolabi – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2025
Measurement invariance (MI) is an essential part of validity evidence concerned with ensuring that tests function similarly across groups, contexts, and time. Most evaluations of MI involve multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) that assume simple structure. However, recent research has shown that constraining non-target indicators to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Error of Measurement, Validity, Monte Carlo Methods
Lanza, Stephanie T.; Tan, Xianming; Bray, Bethany C. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
Although prediction of class membership from observed variables in latent class analysis is well understood, predicting an observed distal outcome from latent class membership is more complicated. A flexible model-based approach is proposed to empirically derive and summarize the class-dependent density functions of distal outcomes with…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods, Comparative Analysis, Statistical Analysis
Price, Larry R. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
The aim of this study was to compare the small sample (N = 1, 3, 5, 10, 15) performance of a Bayesian multivariate vector autoregressive (BVAR-SEM) time series model relative to frequentist power and parameter estimation bias. A multivariate autoregressive model was developed based on correlated autoregressive time series vectors of varying…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Time, Bayesian Statistics, Structural Equation Models
Depaoli, Sarah – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Parameter recovery was assessed within mixture confirmatory factor analysis across multiple estimator conditions under different simulated levels of mixture class separation. Mixture class separation was defined in the measurement model (through factor loadings) and the structural model (through factor variances). Maximum likelihood (ML) via the…
Descriptors: Markov Processes, Factor Analysis, Statistical Bias, Evaluation Research
Castro-Schilo, Laura; Widaman, Keith F.; Grimm, Kevin J. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2013
In 1959, Campbell and Fiske introduced the use of multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices in psychology, and for the past 4 decades confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has commonly been used to analyze MTMM data. However, researchers do not always fit CFA models when MTMM data are available; when CFA modeling is used, multiple models are available…
Descriptors: Multitrait Multimethod Techniques, Factor Analysis, Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods
Leite, Walter L.; Sandbach, Robert; Jin, Rong; MacInnes, Jann W.; Jackman, M. Grace-Anne – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2012
Because random assignment is not possible in observational studies, estimates of treatment effects might be biased due to selection on observable and unobservable variables. To strengthen causal inference in longitudinal observational studies of multiple treatments, we present 4 latent growth models for propensity score matched groups, and…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Probability, Computation, Observation
Peugh, James L.; Enders, Craig K. – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2010
Cluster sampling results in response variable variation both among respondents (i.e., within-cluster or Level 1) and among clusters (i.e., between-cluster or Level 2). Properly modeling within- and between-cluster variation could be of substantive interest in numerous settings, but applied researchers typically test only within-cluster (i.e.,…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Monte Carlo Methods, Multivariate Analysis, Sampling
Forero, Carlos G.; Maydeu-Olivares, Alberto; Gallardo-Pujol, David – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2009
Factor analysis models with ordinal indicators are often estimated using a 3-stage procedure where the last stage involves obtaining parameter estimates by least squares from the sample polychoric correlations. A simulation study involving 324 conditions (1,000 replications per condition) was performed to compare the performance of diagonally…
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Models, Least Squares Statistics, Computation
Herzog, Walter; Boomsma, Anne; Reinecke, Sven – Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007
According to Kenny and McCoach (2003), chi-square tests of structural equation models produce inflated Type I error rates when the degrees of freedom increase. So far, the amount of this bias in large models has not been quantified. In a Monte Carlo study of confirmatory factor models with a range of 48 to 960 degrees of freedom it was found that…
Descriptors: Monte Carlo Methods, Structural Equation Models, Effect Size, Maximum Likelihood Statistics