NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Structural Equation Modeling3
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fan, Xitao; Sivo, Stephen A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2005
In previous research (Hu & Bentler, 1998, 1999), 2 conclusions were drawn: standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) was the most sensitive to misspecified factor covariances, and a group of other fit indexes were most sensitive to misspecified factor loadings. Based on these findings, a 2-index strategy-that is, SRMR coupled with another…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fan, Xitao – Structural Equation Modeling, 1997
The relationship between structural equation modeling (SEM) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) is illustrated. The representation of CCA in SEM may provide interpretive information not available from conventional CCA. Hierarchically, the relationship suggests that SEM is a more general analytic approach. (SLD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Research Methodology, Statistical Analysis, Structural Equation Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fan, Xitao; Wang, Lin; Thompson, Bruce – Structural Equation Modeling, 1999
A Monte Carlo simulation study investigated the effects on 10 structural equation modeling fit indexes of sample size, estimation method, and model specification. Some fit indexes did not appear to be comparable, and it was apparent that estimation method strongly influenced almost all fit indexes examined, especially for misspecified models. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size