Descriptor
Source
Structural Equation Modeling | 13 |
Author
Anderson, Ronald D. | 1 |
Bandalos, Deborah L. | 1 |
Dolan, Connor V. | 1 |
Dunbar, Stephen B. | 1 |
Fan, Xitao | 1 |
Gerbing, David W. | 1 |
Hamilton, Janet G. | 1 |
Hancock, Gregory R. | 1 |
Hox, Joop J. | 1 |
Jackson, Dennis L. | 1 |
Kim, Kevin H. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 13 |
Reports - Evaluative | 8 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Raykov, Tenko; Marcoulides, George A. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2000
Outlines a method for comparing completely standardized solutions in multiple groups. The method is based on a correlation structure analysis of equal-size samples and uses the correlation distribution theory implemented in the structural equation modeling program RAMONA. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Correlation, Sample Size, Structural Equation Models
Kim, Kevin H. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2005
The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling is examined. The noncentrality parameter is required to compute power. The 2 existing methods of computing power have estimated the noncentrality parameter by specifying an alternative hypothesis or alternative fit. These methods cannot be implemented easily and…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Sample Size, Goodness of Fit

Lubke, Gitta H.; Dolan, Connor V. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2003
Simulation results show that the power to detect small mean differences when fitting a model with free residual variances across groups decreases as the difference in R squared increases. This decrease is more pronounced in the presence of correlated errors and if group sample sizes differ. (SLD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Factor Structure, Sample Size, Simulation

Stapleton, Laura M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2002
Studied the use of different weighting techniques in structural equation modeling and found, through simulation, that the use of an effective sample size weight provides unbiased estimates of key parameters and their sampling variances. Also discusses use of a popular normalization technique of scaling weights. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Sample Size, Scaling, Simulation

Nevitt, Jonathan; Hancock, Gregory R. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Evaluated the bootstrap method under varying conditions of nonnormality, sample size, model specification, and number of bootstrap samples drawn from the resampling space. Results for the bootstrap suggest the resampling-based method may be conservative in its control over model rejections, thus having an impact on the statistical power associated…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Power (Statistics), Sample Size, Structural Equation Models

Hox, Joop J.; Maas, Cora J. M. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Assessed the robustness of an estimation method for multilevel and path analysis with hierarchical data proposed by B. Muthen (1989) with unequal groups and small sample sizes and in the presence of a low or high intraclass correlation. Simulation results show the effects of varying these conditions on the within-group and between-groups part of…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Robustness (Statistics), Sample Size, Simulation

Marsh, Herbert W. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1998
Sample covariance matrices constructed with pairwise deletion for randomly missing data were used in a simulation with three sample sizes and five levels of missing data (up to 50%). Parameter estimates were unbiased, parameter variability was largely explicable, and no sample covariance matrices were nonpositive definite except for 50% missing…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Sample Size, Simulation

Gerbing, David W.; Hamilton, Janet G. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1996
A Monte Carlo study evaluated the effectiveness of different factor analysis extraction and rotation methods for identifying the known population multiple-indicator measurement model. Results demonstrate that exploratory factor analysis can contribute to a useful heuristic strategy for model specification prior to cross-validation with…
Descriptors: Heuristics, Mathematical Models, Measurement Techniques, Monte Carlo Methods

Fan, Xitao; Wang, Lin; Thompson, Bruce – Structural Equation Modeling, 1999
A Monte Carlo simulation study investigated the effects on 10 structural equation modeling fit indexes of sample size, estimation method, and model specification. Some fit indexes did not appear to be comparable, and it was apparent that estimation method strongly influenced almost all fit indexes examined, especially for misspecified models. (SLD)
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Monte Carlo Methods, Sample Size

Jackson, Dennis L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2001
Investigated the assumption that determining an adequate sample size in structural equation modeling can be aided by considering the number of parameters to be estimated. Findings from maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis support previous research on the effect of sample size, measured variable reliability, and the number of measured…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Maximum Likelihood Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods, Reliability
Lei, Pui-Wa; Dunbar, Stephen B. – Structural Equation Modeling, 2004
The primary purpose of this study was to examine relative performance of 2 power estimation methods in structural equation modeling. Sample size, alpha level, type of manifest variable, type of specification errors, and size of correlation between constructs were manipulated. Type 1 error rate of the model chi-square test, empirical critical…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Structural Equation Models, Computation, Scores

Bandalos, Deborah L. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1997
Monte Carlo methods were used to study the accuracy and utility of estimators of overall error and error due to approximation in structural equation modeling. Effects of sample size, indicator reliabilities, and degree of misspecification were examined. The rescaled noncentrality parameter also was examined. Choosing among competing models is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Monte Carlo Methods

Anderson, Ronald D. – Structural Equation Modeling, 1996
Goodness of fit indexes developed by R. P. McDonald (1989) and Satorra-Bentler scale correction methods (A. Satorra and P. M. Bentler, 1988) were studied. The Satorra-Bentler index is shown to have the least error under each distributional misspecification level when the model has correct structural specification. (SLD)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Goodness of Fit, Maximum Likelihood Statistics