Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Source
Studies in Educational… | 17 |
Author
King, Jean A. | 2 |
Azzam, Tarek | 1 |
Burry, James | 1 |
Creemers, Bert, P. M. | 1 |
Daillak, Richard H. | 1 |
DeLuca, Christopher | 1 |
Gastic, Billie | 1 |
Glass, Gene V. | 1 |
Irby, Decoteau J. | 1 |
Kovac, Velibor B. | 1 |
Langfeldt, Gjert | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 15 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Information Analyses | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Canada | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Norway | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Azzam, Tarek; Szanyi, Michael – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2011
A sample of educational evaluators was asked to design an outcomes-focused evaluation of a school program that aims to improve the academic achievement and self-esteem of students. Evaluators provided detailed descriptions of their evaluation design and methodology in their responses. These descriptions were coded and analyzed to determine the…
Descriptors: Design, Academic Achievement, Self Esteem, Preferences
Kovac, Velibor B.; Langfeldt, Gjert – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2010
The aim of the present study is to examine the relation between stakeholders as internal evaluators and their systemic positions in light of construal level theory. The study examines the two samples of county representatives, teachers and principals who answered the questionnaire regarding evaluation of the Norwegian assessment program. In…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Questionnaires
DeLuca, Christopher; Poth, Cheryl; Searle, Michelle – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2009
Using a cross-case analysis of three distinct participatory program evaluations, this paper contributes to current discourse on how evaluators create opportunities for learning. Although each team of evaluators intended to promote planned process use, post-evaluation discussions amongst them identified evidence where use emerged throughout the…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Discourse Analysis, Organizational Change, Faculty Development
Gastic, Billie; Irby, Decoteau J.; Zdanis, Maureen – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2008
In this essay, we describe our experiences working with a rebellious primary stakeholder, Sylvia, as evaluators of a district-wide safe schools program. Given the breadth of the program and its multiple target constituencies, we were confronted with the challenges of managing a large number of stakeholders, or those individuals and groups that…
Descriptors: Evaluators, School Districts, Problems, Interpersonal Relationship
Poth, Cheryl-Anne; Shulha, Lyn – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2008
This chapter describes evaluator behaviors revealed by the case analysis of a participatory and developmental evaluation. The analysis revealed that the evaluator paid specific attention to individual stakeholder cues. These cues were related to three elements of the evaluation: negotiating the design, monitoring individual stakeholder needs, and…
Descriptors: Cues, Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Case Studies

Rippey, Robert M. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1979
Differences among impartiality, objectivity, partisanship, fanaticism, and skepticism are viewed as relevant to the role of the evaluator. The desirability of establishing a community of minds committed to argumentation before beginning an evaluation is suggested. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Communication Problems, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators

King, Jean A. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1988
Based on a review of research on evaluation use, the implications for future research and for improving the practice of evaluation are discussed. Six principles of evaluation use are outlined, and internalization of evaluation functions by decision makers is addressed. (TJH)
Descriptors: Administrators, Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Utilization

Stake, Robert – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1998
Describes two evaluation studies that faced ethical problems because of an atmosphere of promotion and advocacy. One was the evaluation of a teachers' professional-development program, and the other was an evaluation of a federally funded youth sports program. The realization and resolution of ethical conduct must come from within the evaluator.…
Descriptors: Athletics, Codes of Ethics, Ethics, Evaluation Problems

Smith, Mary Lee; Glass, Gene V. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1978
Judgmental Policy Analysis was used to form models representing the judgmental policies of 73 educational personnel as they rated 16 programs in which characteristics were varied. Although the judges varied in criteria used and in consistency, the results illustrate potential uses of a methodology for studying the judgmental evaluative process.…
Descriptors: Bias, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

O'Keefe, Michael – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1984
The education evaluation efforts of the federal government are discussed, focusing on the question of their effectiveness in informing the policymaking process. Successful evaluation criteria are outlined. An evaluation must provide useful information to policymakers to be a success. (DWH)
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Federal Government, Federal Legislation

Daillak, Richard H. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1983
This study tracked three program evaluators to describe the school evaluation environment as the evaluators experienced it. It was found that evaluation utilization was low; most principals and teachers resisted evaluation, though program staff were more receptive; evaluation contact with classrooms was regulated; and schools were "doing the…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Case Studies, Educational Environment, Elementary Education

King, Jean A. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1982
Evaluation utilization/use is discussed with the concept of user rationality (including examples where the rational use of evaluation results may be unclear or may be nonuse). A current project focuses on studying the process of evaluation information use and on validating a theory of use. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Decision Making, Definitions, Elementary Secondary Education

Straton, Ralph G. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1977
Five ethical issues concerning evaluation studies are discussed: identification of the study's audiences, choices of variables and information sources, cost effectiveness of instrument and procedures, rights of subjects and program personnel to confidentiality, and relationships between the evaluator and program sponsors, participants, and…
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Cost Effectiveness, Educational Programs, Elementary Secondary Education

Creemers, Bert, P. M.; Terlouw, Cees – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1984
This overview of educational evaluation in the Netherlands provides background and details the state of the art in student, curriculum, and innovation evaluation. The role of international evaluation issues (such as evaluation criteria and the decision-making process) in evaluation theory and practice in The Netherlands is discussed. (BS)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Educational Assessment, Educational Innovation, Educational Research

Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1985
Point of entry problems are faced by evaluators when asked to start an evaluation at an inappropriate time or to perform an inappropriate study. The fundamental purpose of evaluation is to help improve services. Guidelines are presented for choosing when to do a context, input, process, or product evaluation. (GDC)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2