Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Artificial Intelligence | 2 |
Computer Software | 2 |
Identification | 2 |
Plagiarism | 2 |
Writing (Composition) | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Barriers | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
Ethics | 1 |
Integrity | 1 |
Learning Processes | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Teaching of Psychology | 2 |
Author
Autumn B. Hostetter | 1 |
Cassandra Linnertz | 1 |
Elizabeth Nestle | 1 |
Gary D. Fisk | 1 |
Grace Frazier | 1 |
Miaflora Tucci | 1 |
Natalie Call | 1 |
Tristan James | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Gary D. Fisk – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Introduction: Recent innovations in generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have led to an educational environment in which human authorship cannot be assumed, thereby posing a significant challenge to upholding academic integrity. Statement of the problem: Both humans and AI detection technologies have difficulty distinguishing…
Descriptors: Technology Uses in Education, Writing (Composition), Plagiarism, Identification
Autumn B. Hostetter; Natalie Call; Grace Frazier; Tristan James; Cassandra Linnertz; Elizabeth Nestle; Miaflora Tucci – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Background: Psychology instructors frequently assign writing-to-learn exercises that include personal reflection. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can write text that passes for humans in other domains. Objective: Do students and faculty rate a reflection written by GenAI differently than reflections written by students? Do students and…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, College Faculty, Undergraduate Students