Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Cheating | 3 |
Online Courses | 3 |
Ethics | 2 |
Student Attitudes | 2 |
Undergraduate Students | 2 |
Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
COVID-19 | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Teaching of Psychology | 3 |
Author
Brian W. Stone | 1 |
Golding, Jonathan M. | 1 |
Jenkins, Baylee D. | 1 |
Le Grand, Alexis M. | 1 |
Levi, Mary M. | 1 |
Lilly, Deborah R. | 1 |
Mastin, David F. | 1 |
Pals, Andrea M. | 1 |
Peszka, Jennifer | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Brian W. Stone – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Background: Students in higher education are using generative artificial intelligence (AI) despite mixed messages and contradictory policies. Objective: This study helps answer outstanding questions about many aspects of AI in higher education: familiarity, usage, perceptions of peers, ethical/social views, and AI grading. Method: I surveyed 733…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Man Machine Systems, Natural Language Processing, Technology Uses in Education
Jenkins, Baylee D.; Golding, Jonathan M.; Le Grand, Alexis M.; Levi, Mary M.; Pals, Andrea M. – Teaching of Psychology, 2023
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant, unforeseen changes in classroom instructions, including the evaluation of students. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate college students' cheating both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of (a) preponderance of cheating, (b) the factors that may have led to an…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Cheating, Student Behavior
Mastin, David F.; Peszka, Jennifer; Lilly, Deborah R. – Teaching of Psychology, 2009
Psychology students completed a task with reinforcement for successful performance. We tested academic integrity under randomly assigned conditions of check mark acknowledgment of an honor pledge, typed honor pledge, or no pledge. Across all conditions, 14.1% of students inflated their self-reported performance (i.e., cheated). We found no…
Descriptors: Ethics, Integrity, Cheating, Reinforcement