NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Technical Communication:…3
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bush, Don – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Argues that the best approach for technical editors is to abandon the language cops' billy club, listen to what the authors want to say, and give those authors friendly expertise, without rigid prescription or blanket condemnation. (SR)
Descriptors: Editing, Editors, Grammar, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Perry, Devern J. – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1996
Presents results of a national study in which members of the Society for Technical Communication rated the relevance of 20 selected English-usage principles that were considered to be of limited importance in a previous study involving textbook editors and communication instructors. Shows that all 20 principles were rated as important to…
Descriptors: Editing, Grammar, Higher Education, Language Usage
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bush, Don – Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 1994
Discusses ways an editor can cut out words to help the reader understand quickly. Discusses dead wood, redundancy, redundancy in thought, smothered verbs, false precision, editing and academia, and making copy smoother. (SR)
Descriptors: Editing, Language Usage, Redundancy, Revision (Written Composition)