Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
| Written Communication | 1 |
Author
| Ginger V. Shultz | 1 |
| Jasen Chen | 1 |
| Michael N. Petterson | 1 |
| Safron L. Milne | 1 |
| Solaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Michigan (Ann Arbor) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Student Experiences with Peer Review and Revision for Writing-to-Learn in a Chemistry Course Context
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSolaire A. Finkenstaedt-Quinn; Safron L. Milne; Michael N. Petterson; Jasen Chen; Ginger V. Shultz – Written Communication, 2024
Peer review is useful for providing students with formative feedback, yet it is used less frequently in STEM classrooms and for supporting writing-to-learn (WTL). While research indicates the benefits of incorporating peer review into classrooms, less research is focused on students' perceptions thereof. Such research is important as it speaks to…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, Feedback (Response), STEM Education
