NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Carol Booth Olson; Undraa Maamuujav; Jacob Steiss; Huy Chung – Written Communication, 2023
The stagnation of National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Writing scores demonstrates the need for research-based instruction that improves writing for all students, especially English learners. In this article, we synthesize the literature on effective instructional practices for this diverse group of learners and describe how these…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Writing Strategies, Persuasive Discourse, Secondary School Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
De La Paz, Susan; Levin, Daniel M.; Butler, Cameron – Written Communication, 2023
Students with disabilities (SWD) in general education science classes are expected to engage in the scientific practices and potentially in the writing of arguments drawn from evidence. Currently, however, there are few research-based instructional approaches for teaching argument writing for these students. The present article responds to this…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Teaching Methods, Students with Disabilities, Writing (Composition)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
O'Donnell, Angela M.; And Others – Written Communication, 1985
Compares the performance of students who cooperated on an instruction writing task with that of students who worked alone. Concludes that cooperating dyads can improve the communicative quality of their instruction writing. (FL)
Descriptors: Cooperation, Higher Education, Peer Teaching, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schriver, Karen A. – Written Communication, 1992
Evaluates the reader-protocol method of teaching writers to anticipate readers' comprehension needs. Involves asking writers to predict readers' problems with a text and providing them with reader responses. Finds that writers taught with the reader-protocol method improved more than writers in control classes, and increased in their ability to…
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Higher Education, Reader Response, Reader Text Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, William L.; And Others – Written Communication, 1985
Concludes that structure of topic makes a difference in writing quality, fluency, and total error but not in any error ratio. Suggests that, for placement testing, educators should first decide which types of students they wish to identify, because each topic structure distinguishes low, average, and high ability students differently. Topic…
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, College Freshmen, Higher Education, Reader Response