Descriptor
Ability | 4 |
Adaptive Testing | 4 |
Comparative Testing | 4 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Higher Education | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Estimation (Mathematics) | 2 |
Mathematics Tests | 2 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Algebra | 1 |
Community Colleges | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Lunz, Mary E.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1992
The effects of reviewing items and altering responses on the efficiency of computerized adaptive tests and resultant ability estimates of the examinees were explored for medical technology students (220 students could and 492 students could not review and alter their responses). Data do not support disallowing review. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Kim, Haeok; Plake, Barbara S. – 1993
A two-stage testing strategy is one method of adapting the difficulty of a test to an individual's ability level in an effort to achieve more precise measurement. A routing test provides an initial estimate of ability level, and a second-stage measurement test then evaluates the examinee further. The measurement accuracy and efficiency of item…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Wise, Steven L.; And Others – 1993
This study assessed whether providing examinees with a choice between computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and self-adaptive testing (SAT) affects test performance in comparison with being assigned a CAT or SAT, and evaluated variables influencing examinee choice of either test form. The relative influences of test type and test choice on examinee…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algebra, College Students

Legg, Sue M.; Buhr, Dianne C. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1992
Three computerized adaptive tests (CATs) in mathematics, reading, and writing were administered to 628 community college students to determine whether examinees of different ethnic, gender, ability, and age groups, and computer experience were differentially affected. Some differences exist; however, they do not preclude use of CATs. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Age Differences, College Students