Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Ability | 7 |
Adaptive Testing | 7 |
Efficiency | 7 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 5 |
Comparative Analysis | 4 |
Simulation | 4 |
Test Items | 3 |
Branching | 2 |
Computation | 2 |
Computer Oriented Programs | 2 |
Decision Making | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Davey, Tim | 2 |
Kalisch, Stanley James, Jr. | 2 |
Parshall, Cynthia G. | 2 |
Nering, Mike L. | 1 |
Penfield, Randall D. | 1 |
Vispoel, Walter P. | 1 |
Xie, Qing | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses | 1 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Xie, Qing – ProQuest LLC, 2019
The advantages of administering an adaptive test battery, a collection of multiple adaptive subtests that are specifically tailored to examinees' abilities, include shortening the subtest length and maintaining the accuracy of individual subtest scores. The test battery can incorporate a range of subjects, though this study focused primarily on…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Correlation, Ability
Penfield, Randall D. – Applied Measurement in Education, 2006
This study applied the maximum expected information (MEI) and the maximum posterior-weighted information (MPI) approaches of computer adaptive testing item selection to the case of a test using polytomous items following the partial credit model. The MEI and MPI approaches are described. A simulation study compared the efficiency of ability…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items
Parshall, Cynthia G.; Davey, Tim; Nering, Mike L. – 1998
When items are selected during a computerized adaptive test (CAT) solely with regard to their measurement properties, it is commonly found that certain items are administered to nearly every examinee, and that a small number of the available items will account for a large proportion of the item administrations. This presents a clear security risk…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Efficiency
Davey, Tim; Parshall, Cynthia G. – 1995
Although computerized adaptive tests acquire their efficiency by successively selecting items that provide optimal measurement at each examinee's estimated level of ability, operational testing programs will typically consider additional factors in item selection. In practice, items are generally selected with regard to at least three, often…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing
Kalisch, Stanley James, Jr. – 1974
The four purposes of this study were: (1) To compare two versions of a tailored testing model similar to one suggested by Kalisch (1974); (2) To identify levels of the variables within the two versions, which produce an efficient tailored testing procedures; (3) To compare, within each version, the results obtained when employing relatively small…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Branching, Comparative Analysis
Kalisch, Stanley James, Jr. – 1975
Two tailored testing models, specifying procedures by which the correctness of examinees' responses to a fixed number of test items are predicted by presenting as few items as possible to the examinee, were compared for their efficiency. The models differ in that one requires reconsideration of each prediction whenever additional information is…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Branching, Comparative Analysis

Vispoel, Walter P.; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Vocabulary fixed-item (FIT), computerized-adaptive (CAT), and self-adapted (SAT) tests were compared with 121 college students. CAT was more precise and efficient than SAT, which was more precise and efficient than FIT. SAT also yielded higher ability estimates for individuals with lower verbal self-concepts. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, College Students, Comparative Analysis