Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
| Heinrich, Carolyn | 2 |
| Acosta, Rudy | 1 |
| Burch, Patricia | 1 |
| Burch, Patricia Ellen | 1 |
| Good, Annalee | 1 |
| Good, Annalee G. | 1 |
| Stewart, Mary S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California (Los Angeles) | 1 |
| Illinois (Chicago) | 1 |
| Minnesota (Minneapolis) | 1 |
| Texas (Austin) | 1 |
| Wisconsin (Milwaukee) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGood, Annalee G.; Burch, Patricia Ellen; Stewart, Mary S.; Acosta, Rudy; Heinrich, Carolyn – Teachers College Record, 2014
Background/Context: Under supplemental educational services ("supplemental services"), a parental choice provision of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), schools that have not made adequate yearly progress in increasing student achievement are required to offer low-income families free, afterschool tutoring. Existing research shows low…
Descriptors: Tutoring, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs, Federal Legislation
Download full textBurch, Patricia; Heinrich, Carolyn; Good, Annalee – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2013
Because digital tutoring is rapidly expanding, more rigorous, independent evaluations of their effectiveness is critical to inform federal, state, and local policy decisions that influence their role and application of technology in educating underserved students. The in-depth observations and vignettes in this paper illustrate the challenges in…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Technology Uses in Education, Tutoring, After School Programs
