Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Academic Achievement | 4 |
Evaluation Criteria | 4 |
Federal Programs | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
Definitions | 2 |
Educational Policy | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Federal Aid | 2 |
Federal Legislation | 2 |
Grants | 2 |
Outcomes of Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Data Quality Campaign | 1 |
Research Quarterly for… | 1 |
Society for Research on… | 1 |
US Department of Education | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Guides - General | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Florida | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
South Carolina | 1 |
Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Race to the Top | 4 |
American Recovery and… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rink, Judith E. – Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2013
This article summarizes the research base on teacher effectiveness in physical education from a historical perspective and explores the implications of the recent emphasis on student performance and teacher observation systems to evaluate teachers for physical education. The problems and the potential positive effects of using student performance…
Descriptors: Physical Education, Teacher Effectiveness, Accountability, Teacher Evaluation
Hansen, Michael; Choi, Kilchan – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2012
The criteria for determining the student outcomes that define a school as having "turned around" are not well defined, and the definition of turnaround performance varies across studies. Although current policy initiatives offer guidelines for identifying CLP schools, there is no standard definition or methodology in common usage. This…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Evidence, Middle Schools, Federal Programs
Race to the Top District Competition: The Data Quality Campaign's Comments on ED's Proposed Criteria
Data Quality Campaign, 2012
The Data Quality Campaign (DQC) submits these comments in response to the US Department of Education's (ED) draft requirements, priorities, selection criteria, and definitions for the Race to the Top District (RTT-D) competition. DQC applauds ED for including the following components of the proposal: (1) Data is acknowledged throughout the…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Competition, Educational Change, Best Practices
US Department of Education, 2010
The Race to the Top program is authorized under sections 14005 and 14006 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Race to the Top is a competitive grant program to encourage and reward States that are implementing significant reforms in the four education areas described in the ARRA: enhancing standards and assessments,…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Federal Programs, Educational Legislation, Federal Aid