Descriptor
Source
Journal of Learning… | 6 |
Author
Van den Broeck, Wim | 2 |
Clark, Elaine | 1 |
Fletcher, Jack M. | 1 |
Fuchs, Douglas | 1 |
Fuchs, Lynn S. | 1 |
Mathes, Patricia G. | 1 |
Reynolds, Cecil R. | 1 |
Roberts, P. Holley | 1 |
Willson, Victor L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Fletcher, Jack M.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1992
This study, involving 1,069 children (ages 9-14) referred for evaluation of learning disability, used 3 definitions of reading disability to provide criteria for 5 groups of children based on discrepancy between intelligence quotient (IQ) and academic achievement. Results question the validity of segregating children with reading deficiencies…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Definitions, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education

Van den Broeck, Wim – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
This article argues that the regression-based discrepancy method used in the diagnosis of learning disabilities is invalid because it is inconsistent with the underlying underachievement concept of which it is intended to be the operationalization. It is mathematically demonstrated that the regression-based discrepancy method largely reflects…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adults, Children, Clinical Diagnosis

Willson, Victor L.; Reynolds, Cecil R. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
This article evaluates conclusions in Van den Broeck's article (2002) that argue the regression-based discrepancy method (RDM) used in learning disabilities diagnosis is invalid because it is inconsistent with the underlying underachievement concept of which it is intended to be the operationalization. It concludes acceptable models support the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adults, Children, Clinical Diagnosis

Van den Broeck, Wim – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2002
This article responds to a critique by Willson and Reynolds (2002) that argued for the use of the regression-based discrepancy method (RDM) for identifying learning disabilities. It argues the statistical and theoretical counterarguments are based on a misreading of the statistical models presented. (Contains 8 references.) (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adults, Children, Clinical Diagnosis

Mathes, Patricia G.; Fuchs, Douglas; Roberts, P. Holley; Fuchs, Lynn S. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1998
A study involving 24 special educators and 31 regular educators found that special educators using transenvironmental programming who received curriculum-based measurement information about their students' academic progress were more likely to plan and implement academic interventions in preparation for students' transition than those who did not…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Curriculum Based Assessment, Disabilities, Educational Planning

Clark, Elaine – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1996
The school reentry of students with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is discussed, focusing on federal legislation requirements, TBI characteristics, assessment methods, the range of services that need to be considered, problems affecting students' academic and social functioning, need for a school team approach, schedule for reintegration planning,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Case Studies, Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education