Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Group Testing | 2 |
| Individual Testing | 2 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Blended Learning | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Desrochers, Marcie N. | 1 |
| Fink, Herbert C. | 1 |
| Kimmerling, Joe | 1 |
| McCall, Megan O'Neill | 1 |
| Thomas, Andrea | 1 |
| Tung, Wendy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMcCall, Megan O'Neill – ProQuest LLC, 2017
This study examined the effects of cooperative testing versus traditional or individual testing and the impacts on academic achievement, motivation toward science, and study time for 9th grade biology students. Research questions centered on weekly quizzes given in a flipped classroom format for a period of 13 weeks. The study used a mixed methods…
Descriptors: Individual Testing, Group Testing, Academic Achievement, Learning Motivation
Peer reviewed
Download full textDesrochers, Marcie N.; Fink, Herbert C.; Thomas, Andrea; Kimmerling, Joe; Tung, Wendy – International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 2007
Alternatives to a solitary testing format can involve students working in teams to arrive at the correct answer. We compared two group assessment methods, cooperative and competitive, to a solitary testing approach. In most comparisons examining the undergraduate respondents' (N = 77) performance, the two group-testing methods were equivalent.…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Alternative Assessment, Group Testing
