NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nissen, Jayson M.; Jariwala, Manher; Close, Eleanor W.; Van Dusen, Ben – International Journal of STEM Education, 2018
Background: High-stakes assessments, such the Graduate Records Examination, have transitioned from paper to computer administration. Low-stakes research-based assessments (RBAs), such as the Force Concept Inventory, have only recently begun this transition to computer administration with online services. These online services can simplify…
Descriptors: Research Design, College Students, Science Instruction, Physics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Flesch, Michael; Ostler, Elliot – MathAMATYC Educator, 2010
This article presents the results of a study focused on the issue of how proctored testing affects student test scores in a formal Intermediate Algebra course setting. The study follows a model of assessment in which students in one group have taken two of their five unit exams as proctored tests along with a proctored comprehensive final exam,…
Descriptors: Supervision, Academic Achievement, Tests, Algebra
Kim, Do-Hong; Huynh, Huynh – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2007
This study examined comparability of student scores obtained from computerized and paper-and-pencil formats of the large-scale statewide end-of-course (EOC) examinations in the two subject areas of Algebra and Biology. Evidence in support of comparability of computerized and paper-based tests was sought by examining scale scores, item parameter…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Measures (Individuals), Biology, Algebra
Puhan, Gautam; Boughton, Keith; Kim, Sooyeon – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2007
The study evaluated the comparability of two versions of a certification test: a paper-and-pencil test (PPT) and computer-based test (CBT). An effect size measure known as Cohen's d and differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were used as measures of comparability at the test and item levels, respectively. Results indicated that the effect…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Effect Size, Test Bias, Mathematics Tests
Powell, Z. Emily – 1992
Little research exists on the psychological impacts of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and how it may affect test performance. Three CAT procedures were examined, in which items were selected to match students' achievement levels, from the item pool at random, or according to student choice of item difficulty levels. Twenty-four graduate…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Adaptive Testing, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Weiss, David J., Ed. – 1980
This report is the Proceedings of the third conference of its type. Included are 23 of the 25 papers presented at the conference, discussion of these papers by invited discussants, and symposium papers by a group of leaders in adaptive testing and latent trait test theory research and applications. The papers are organized into the following…
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Achievement, Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Bejar, Isaac I.; And Others – 1977
Information provided by typical and improved conventional classroom achievement tests was compared with information provided by an adaptive test covering the same subject matter. Both tests were administered to over 700 college students in a general biology course. Using the same scoring method, adaptive testing was found to yield substantially…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Biology