Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Educational Legislation | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Supplementary Education | 2 |
| Tutorial Programs | 2 |
| Tutoring | 2 |
| After School Programs | 1 |
| Disadvantaged Schools | 1 |
| Educationally Disadvantaged | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Minority Group Children | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Direct linkGrainger, Michael J. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
Under the mandates of No Child Left Behind, supplemental educational services (SES) in the form of tutoring are provided to eligible students who attend schools in the 3rd year of program improvement status. A local suburban school district in the southern California currently uses a 3rd party tutoring model to provide tutoring services in both…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Tutoring, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedZimmer, Ron; Hamilton, Laura; Christina, Rachel – Economics of Education Review, 2010
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) legislation has created pressure for districts to improve their students' proficiency levels on state tests. Districts that fail to meet their academic targets for 3 years must use their Title I funds to pay for supplemental education services (SES) that provide tutoring or other academic instruction. Many…
Descriptors: Tutoring, After School Programs, Public Schools, Urban Schools
