Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Guides - General | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Brookhart, Susan M. – Oxford Review of Education, 2013
The United States education system depends on legislation and funding at the federal, state and local levels. Public understanding of assessment therefore is important to educational reform in the USA. Educational reformers often invoke assessment information as a reason for reform, typically by citing unacceptable achievement on some measure or…
Descriptors: Educational Change, Educational Assessment, Public Opinion, Educational Indicators
Baker, Melissa; Johnston, Pattie – Journal of Instructional Psychology, 2010
High-stakes testing plays a critical role in education today in the United States. Every state uses a high-stakes test to comply with the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) mandate. While many believe high-stakes testing is an acceptable and accurate way to measure students' learning, one has to ask whether high stakes testing is an effective measurement…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Disadvantaged Youth, Testing, High Stakes Tests
Milton, Ohmer – National Forum: Phi Kappa Phi Journal, 1980
It is suggested that little attention is given to understanding student concerns about testing: what will be tested, and in what depth. Reexamination is indicated for the purposes of testing, test quality and frequency, and instructor autonomy. Tests are seen as powerful determinants of learning that are often not used appropriately. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Students, Higher Education, Measurement Objectives
Brickell, Henry M. – 1978
This combined discussion guide and questionnaire, intended for public or professional audiences, consists of three major sections. The first section is a narrative background description of major issues, options, and arguments for minimum competency testing: Will you test minimum competencies? What competencies will you require? How will you…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Basic Skills, Competency Based Education