Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Academic Achievement | 6 |
Growth Models | 6 |
Value Added Models | 6 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Portfolio Assessment | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Teacher Effectiveness | 2 |
Teacher Evaluation | 2 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
Best Practices | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
AASA Journal of Scholarship &… | 1 |
Educational Practice and… | 1 |
Online Submission | 1 |
ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Reform Support Network | 1 |
Texas Education Agency | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Shayla Wiggins Savage – ProQuest LLC, 2024
The number of low-performing schools has drastically increased since COVID-19. During the 2018-2019 school year, there were 488 low-performing schools (North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, 2024). The number increased to 736 schools during the 2023- 2024 school year, a 50.8% increase (North Carolina Department of Public Instruction,…
Descriptors: Teacher Leadership, Discipline, Teacher Persistence, Grades (Scholastic)
Patrick, Drew – AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 2016
New York State has used the Growth Model for Educator Evaluation ratings since the 2011-2012 school year. Since that time, student growth percentiles have been used as the basis for teacher and principal ratings. While a great deal has been written about the use of student test scores to measures educator effectiveness, less attention has been…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Effectiveness, Value Added Models, Multivariate Analysis
Texas Education Agency, 2016
Beginning in the 2017-2018 school year, appraisal systems in Texas, whether the state-recommended system or a locally developed system, will need to include a measure of student growth at the individual teacher level. Student growth measures how much a student progresses academically during his or her time with a particular teacher. It takes into…
Descriptors: Growth Models, Outcome Measures, Academic Achievement, Portfolio Assessment
Reform Support Network, 2015
This publication summarizes the key discussion from experts in the field of measuring student growth during a convening held February 2015. Experts heard about two emerging approaches to measuring growth: Portfolios of student work samples and unit value-added models that provide teachers with timely and actionable feedback that they can use to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Portfolio Assessment, Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Effectiveness
Schmitt, Lisa; Hutchins, Shaun – Online Submission, 2016
This report provides an overview of the process used to derive a school's growth level and summarizes 2015 math and reading/ELA growth levels for all AISD elementary, middle and high schools. Additionally, longitudinal data are provided for each school level.
Descriptors: School Districts, Academic Achievement, Elementary School Students, Middle School Students
Martin, Andrew J. – Educational Practice and Theory, 2011
There are ongoing debates as to the merits of mastery and performance (or competitive) approaches to school and student learning. Mastery approaches are focused on factors and processes such as effort, skill development, learning, and understanding. Performance approaches are focused more on competition, demonstrating relative ability, social…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Best Practices, Mastery Learning, Learning Motivation