NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hindman, Jane E. – Journal of Basic Writing, 1999
Claims compositionists misrecognize stylistic and institutionalized conventions of academic discourse in their own rhetoric and in the evaluation of their students. Argues that students should be included in the practices by which compositionists "normalize" these conventions. Suggests how students might be included in the evaluative…
Descriptors: Academic Discourse, Basic Writing, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grobman, Laurie – Journal of Basic Writing, 1999
Analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of a project that used a peer group leader to help build bridges between basic writers and academic writers. Discusses the implications for the further use of peer group leaders in basic writing. (NH)
Descriptors: Academic Discourse, Basic Writing, Freshman Composition, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hindman, Jane E. – Journal of Basic Writing, 1993
Contends that evaluations of student writing come not from some transcendent realm but from the discursive practices by which teachers authorize themselves within a given community. Argues that basic writers need explicit knowledge of such practices, and proposes a language-centered curriculum to teach it. (HB)
Descriptors: Academic Discourse, Basic Skills, Basic Writing, Discourse Modes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Center, Carole – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 2004
Contrastive rhetoric provides tools that community college teachers need in order to understand the rhetorical forms that students from other cultures employ. Greater understanding of contrastive rhetoric can change the way that teachers interpret the difficulty linguistically different students may have in using conventional American academic…
Descriptors: Rhetoric, Cultural Differences, English (Second Language), Writing (Composition)