NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)19
Source
New Directions for Evaluation20
Audience
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feinstein, Osvaldo Nestor – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
Evaluation of programs or projects is often perceived as a threat. This is to a great extent related to the anticipated use of evaluation for accountability, which is often prioritized at the expense of using evaluation as a learning tool. Frequently it is argued that there is a trade-off between these two evaluation functions. An alternative…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Accountability, Program Evaluation, Research Tools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Volkov, Boris B. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
This chapter features a recent conversation with Dr. Arnold J. Love, a long-time proponent of internal evaluation and one of the most cited internal evaluation authors. In 1983, Love edited the first issue of "New Directions for Program Evaluation" on the topic of internal evaluation. He is the author of the book "Internal…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Program Evaluation, Interviews, Organizational Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eddy, Rebecca M.; Berry, Tiffany – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The field of evaluation faces a number of serious challenges in light of No Child Left Behind legislation, among them feasibility, resources, and blurring lines among research, evaluation, and assessment. At the same time, these challenges open the door for opportunities in evaluation. Now more than ever, the expertise of evaluators is needed and…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mathison, Sandra – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
The author analyzes the growth and nature of internal evaluation from the 1960s to the present and suggests that internal evaluation has been on the increase because of its perceived importance. Although the 1960s were characterized by a rich intellectual development of evaluation theory and practice, the fiscal conservatism of the 1980s ushered…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Accountability, Public Administration, Political Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A.; Rohmer-Hirt, Johnna A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2011
From the 1980s to the present, educational accountability in the United States has grown dramatically. Such accountability in U.S. school districts, although driven primarily by external demands, has internal manifestations as well. The chapter traces the historical development of internal evaluation in American school districts, then highlights…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Testing Programs, Standardized Tests, School Districts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Azin, Mariam; Resendez, Miriam G. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Evaluators face a number of challenges in using student assessment data, given varying state and federal accountability requirements. Approaches to measuring student progress and specific characteristics of state assessment systems influence how data can be used. The continuous changes to state assessment systems and data create a significant…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Student Evaluation, Federal Legislation, Academic Achievement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schmitt, Lisa N. T.; Whitsett, Maria Defino – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
A district evaluator in a large Texas district examines new challenges arising since implementation of No Child Left Behind, relating to (1) navigating competing requirements in state and federal accountability systems; (2) evaluating effectiveness of sanctions districts are required to address; (3) using scientifically based research (SBR) to…
Descriptors: Management Systems, Evaluators, Sanctions, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rodosky, Robert J.; Munoz, Marco A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2009
The authors write about evaluation, testing, and research and their relation to policy, planning, and program in the Jefferson County Public Schools (JCPS) in Louisville, Kentucky. The authors focus on evaluation and testing for accountability and on managing the unit for this purpose. In detail they show the many evaluation demands from both…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Testing, Accountability, School Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Behrens, Teresa R.; Kelly, Thomas – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
An overview is presented of forces that have shaped how public and private funders approach evaluation, including the challenges that funders, and particularly foundations, face in effectively using evaluation within an organizational learning framework. Even with internal organizational challenges to learning, foundations are increasingly…
Descriptors: Knowledge Management, Program Evaluation, Measurement, Philanthropic Foundations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Guillen-Woods, Blanca Flor; Kaiser, Monica A.; Harrington, Maura J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
The impact of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is usually understood in relation to schools and districts, but the legislation has also affected community-based organizations that operate school-linked programs. This case study of an after-school program in California demonstrates how educational accountability systems that emphasize students' academic…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Federal Legislation, Program Improvement, After School Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
King, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
This article discusses how to make process use an independent variable in evaluation practice: the purposeful means of building an organization's capacity to conduct and use evaluations in the long run. The goal of evaluation capacity building (ECB) is to strengthen and sustain effective program evaluation practices through a number of activities:…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Predictor Variables, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Patton, Michael Quinn – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Extension and evaluation share some similar challenges, including working with diverse stakeholders, parallel processes for focusing priorities, meeting common standards of excellence, and adapting to globalization, new technologies, and changing times. Evaluations of extension programs have helped clarify how change occurs, especially the…
Descriptors: Program Development, Global Approach, Evaluation Criteria, Extension Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hendricks, Michael; Plantz, Margaret C.; Pritchard, Kathleen J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
In 1996, United Way of America (UWA) developed and began disseminating the most widely used approach to program outcome measurement in the nonprofit sector. Today an estimated 450 local United Ways encourage approximately 19,000 local agencies they fund to measure outcomes. The authors first describe and then assess the strengths and limitations…
Descriptors: Nonprofit Organizations, Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness, Community Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Taylor-Powell, Ellen; Boyd, Heather H. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Evaluation capacity building, or ECB, is an area of great interest within the field of evaluation as well as in Extension evaluation. Internal Extension evaluators have long offered training and technical assistance to help Extension educators conduct evaluation. Today ECB in Extension encompasses myriad activities and processes to advance…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Models, Organizational Change, Logical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gullickson, Arlen R.; Hanssen, Carl E. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
This article uses a program-level evaluation to assess the characteristics of smaller-scale project evaluations and their use for project improvement and accountability purposes. The authors used available information from the annual Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program evaluation surveys to describe the characteristics of evaluation…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Measures (Individuals), Accountability
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2