NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)4
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 30 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vogel, Linda R.; Weiler, Spencer; Armenta, Anthony – Planning and Changing, 2014
Various state and national forces are influencing principal preparation programs, including competition from online for-profit institutions, teacher evaluation, school accountability, equity, and Response to Intervention mandates that require university-based leadership preparation programs to re-examine and revise program delivery and content.…
Descriptors: Principals, Administrator Education, Competition, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Champ, Cheryl H. – AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 2015
As part of the "American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009," the U.S. Department of Education sponsored the "Race to the Top" competition to encourage education reforms anchored in improving teacher effectiveness as a driver for improving student-achievement outcomes and closing achievement gaps. The New York State…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Organizational Culture, Program Implementation, Semi Structured Interviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Carr, Christine V.; Galassi, John P. – Journal of School Counseling, 2012
The ASCA National Model's theme and element definitions were used to investigate the school counselor's role in dropout prevention. The domains recommended by the What Works Clearinghouse (staying-in-school, progressing-in-school, and completing-school) were used to determine how accountability should be assessed. Results indicate that counselors…
Descriptors: Dropouts, Accountability, School Counselors, Delivery Systems
Leuschner, Kristin J. – RAND Corporation, 2010
During the past two decades, performance-based accountability systems (PBASs), which link financial or other incentives to measured performance as a means of improving services, have gained popularity among policymakers. Although PBASs can vary widely across sectors, they share three main components: goals (i.e., one or more long-term outcomes to…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Rewards, Public Service, Public Sector
Baker, Pamela C. – 1990
The paper describes Quality Service Management (QSM) as applied to the provision of services to disabled and other special needs persons. QSM is defined as a systems approach to consumer relations based on the belief that quality care may be achieved only within the context of overall services management. Differences among "quality…
Descriptors: Accountability, Delivery Systems, Disabilities, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Racusin, Robert; Krell, Helen – Administration in Mental Health, 1980
Advantages and disadvantages to various methods of assuring quality and accountability in community mental health centers are discussed. Examples are external structure review, peer monitoring, and site visitation. (LAB)
Descriptors: Accountability, Community Health Services, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grossman, Herbert J.; Rowitz, Louis – Mental Retardation, 1974
Presented are a history, a review of evaluation research, and suggested future directions in program accountability for the retarded. (CL)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administration, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coulton, Claudia J. – Social Work, 1982
Suggests that many aspects of quality assurance in health care can be applied to social service agencies. Reviews what has been learned about quality assurance in health care and suggests guidelines for its implementation in social services. (Author/JAC)
Descriptors: Accountability, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Connolly, Peg – Parks and Recreation, 1982
Evaluation is one method of determining accountability in human service programs. A generic evaluation approach contains several steps: (1) stating a purpose for evaluating the program; (2) identifying evaluation questions; (3) identifying the nature of evaluation information; (4) collecting evaluation information; (5) analyzing evaluation…
Descriptors: Accountability, Cost Effectiveness, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kiresuk, Thomas J.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
The consumer of a service is of primary importance when defining groups most concerned with program impact. Program effectiveness for the consumer may be increased through the use of certain guiding principles based on the extension of existing quality assurance and program evaluation methodologies. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Accountability, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods, Human Services
Hogan, Cornelius D. – 1999
Since 1992, Vermont has been pioneering the development of community partnerships for improving social well-being, using indicators to track success. The working definition of a community, for outcome purposes, is the area served by a school supervisory union. Vermont is divided into 60 such supervisory unions (school districts), but…
Descriptors: Accountability, Community Programs, Delivery Systems, Elementary Secondary Education
Ellis, Gary; Witt, Peter A. – Parks and Recreation, 1982
A model is presented to demonstrate that systematic evaluation by design or planned, purposeful evaluation of recreational programs is possible. The evaluation model concepts of control group, randomization, and pretest and posttest are explained. (JN)
Descriptors: Accountability, Control Groups, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods
Edyburn, Dave L. – Diagnostique, 2000
This article describes using collegial conversations to consider assistive technology (AT) and evaluate its impact. A self-study process is used to engage educators in a series of conversations about AT outcomes. Four topics structure the conversations: AT and human performance, AT considerations, AT service delivery systems, and accountability…
Descriptors: Accountability, Assistive Devices (for Disabled), Delivery Systems, Disabilities
Cohen, Elena; Ooms, Theodora – 1993
This briefing report on program evaluation notes that the new wave of family-centered, integrated services is forcing the field to rethink its methodology, and that the move towards outcome-driven reforms requires carefully defined outcomes and ways to measure them. Highlights of a seminar meeting held to explore these issues are included. The…
Descriptors: Accountability, Data Collection, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods
Baker, Eva L.; Linn, Robert L.; Herman, Joan L.; Koretz, Daniel – 2002
This document presents standards for educational accountability systems that represent models of practice derived from three perspectives: research knowledge, practical experience, and ethical considerations. These standards should be conceived of as targets for state and local systems and as criteria to judge proposed models of accountability…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accountability, Delivery Systems, Educational Practices
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2