Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 36 |
Descriptor
Accountability | 36 |
Low Achievement | 36 |
Predictor Variables | 36 |
Educational Indicators | 33 |
Comparative Analysis | 31 |
Elementary Schools | 31 |
Middle Schools | 31 |
Educational Improvement | 30 |
Educational Legislation | 30 |
Educational Policy | 30 |
Federal Legislation | 30 |
More ▼ |
Source
Thomas B. Fordham Institute | 29 |
ProQuest LLC | 2 |
Regional Educational… | 2 |
Educational Policy | 1 |
Journal of Vocational… | 1 |
NASSP Bulletin | 1 |
Author
Bosker, Roel J. | 1 |
Carol Ann Malphrus Hudgens | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Doolaard, Simone | 1 |
Garland, Marshall | 1 |
Hochbein, Craig | 1 |
Kilborn, Mitchell | 1 |
Li, Yibing | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Mitchell, Amanda M. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 29 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 2 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 31 |
Middle Schools | 31 |
Grade 3 | 29 |
Grade 4 | 29 |
Grade 5 | 29 |
Grade 6 | 29 |
Grade 7 | 29 |
Grade 8 | 29 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 28 |
High Schools | 3 |
Secondary Education | 3 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Texas | 4 |
Arizona | 2 |
California | 2 |
Colorado | 2 |
Delaware | 2 |
Florida | 2 |
Georgia | 2 |
Idaho | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Indiana | 2 |
Kansas | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 30 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Carol Ann Malphrus Hudgens – ProQuest LLC, 2022
This study was designed to determine whether the alignment of state and local priorities was a predictor of improving results, specifically the reduction in the percentage of inexperienced principals and percentages of low-performing schools and the increase in graduation rates. The population of this study included 115 North Carolina school…
Descriptors: Alignment (Education), Educational Improvement, Court Litigation, Principals
Li, Yibing; Garland, Marshall; Kilborn, Mitchell – Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest, 2022
The School Improvement Division of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) identifies, monitors, and supports low-performing schools. To identify low-performing schools, TEA assigns annual academic accountability ratings to its districts and schools, but these ratings are provided only once per year and are vulnerable to disruptions in the assessment…
Descriptors: Accountability, Low Achievement, Educational Indicators, Student Behavior
Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest, 2022
The School Improvement Division of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) identifies, monitors, and supports low-performing schools. To identify low-performing schools, TEA assigns annual academic accountability ratings to its districts and schools, but these ratings are provided only once per year and are vulnerable to disruptions in the assessment…
Descriptors: Accountability, Low Achievement, Educational Indicators, Student Behavior
Hochbein, Craig; Mitchell, Amanda M.; Pollio, Martin – NASSP Bulletin, 2013
The recent policy focus on the turnaround of persistently low-achieving schools has generated considerable debate about the reforms needed to dramatically and quickly increase school performance. The purpose of this article is not to focus on specific turnaround interventions, but rather on the identification of schools slated to receive these…
Descriptors: School Turnaround, School Effectiveness, Low Achievement, Intervention
Sorapuru, Wylene M. – ProQuest LLC, 2012
Federal legislation and educational programs such as "No Child Left Behind" (2001) and "Race to the Top" (2009) identify school leaders as one of the major catalysts to improving academic achievement. Increasing accountability demands call for replacement of the principal when adequate gains in student achievement are not met,…
Descriptors: Career Choice, Decision Making, Principals, Persistence
Timmermans, Anneke C.; Bosker, Roel J.; Doolaard, Simone; de Wolf, Inge – Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 2012
This study investigates the possibilities of estimating value added as a performance indicator in senior secondary vocational education. Value added is interesting in this context because it is considered as a reliable tool for comparing the effectiveness of educational institutions. Although value added indicators have been developed since the…
Descriptors: School Effectiveness, Program Effectiveness, Educational Attainment, Vocational Education
Perna, Laura W.; Thomas, Scott L. – Educational Policy, 2009
This study explores the ways that state high school testing policies shape college opportunity among students attending 15 high schools in five states. The authors use multiple descriptive case studies to explore how testing policies influence key predictors of college enrollment (e.g., high school graduation, academic preparation, knowledge, and…
Descriptors: High Schools, Testing, Graduation, High Stakes Tests
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs