Publication Date
In 2025 | 5 |
Since 2024 | 19 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 99 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 244 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 821 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 125 |
Administrators | 75 |
Policymakers | 66 |
Teachers | 52 |
Researchers | 31 |
Community | 5 |
Counselors | 5 |
Parents | 5 |
Students | 5 |
Support Staff | 4 |
Media Staff | 1 |
More ▼ |
Location
California | 64 |
Canada | 50 |
Texas | 49 |
United States | 44 |
Australia | 40 |
Florida | 39 |
Kentucky | 38 |
United Kingdom (England) | 33 |
North Carolina | 32 |
Michigan | 24 |
Colorado | 22 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards | 1 |
Yusoff, Shahazwan bin Mat; Razak, Rafiza Abdul; Leng, Chin Hai; Marzaini, Anwar Farhan bin – Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2023
This research probed the perceptions of secondary school science teachers concerning the objective and utility of assessment, exploring the influences of gender, teaching experience, and specific science subject components. A total of 100 secondary school teachers from Selangor participated in the study, completing the Teacher's Conception of…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Secondary School Teachers, Science Teachers, Evaluation Methods
Karen Blackburn Hoeve – ProQuest LLC, 2021
High stakes test-based accountability systems primarily rely on aggregates and derivatives of scores from tests that were originally developed to measure individual student mastery of content specifications. Current validity models do not explicitly address this use of aggregate scores to measure the performance of teachers, administrators, and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Test Validity, High Stakes Tests, Hierarchical Linear Modeling
Andrew Neuendorf – ProQuest LLC, 2022
The purpose of this qualitative case study was to examine how faculty chairs at a large, Midwestern community college understand and engage with the assessment of student learning outcomes within academic programs. This study was informed by two conceptual paradigms of assessment: accountability and improvement. Sensemaking was used as a…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Student Evaluation, Accountability
Thompson, Jeffery Scott – ProQuest LLC, 2023
The purpose of this comparative quantitative study was to test adherence to the accountability theory by comparing perceptions of South Carolina public school principals without procedural due process rights as administrators with public school principals in New Jersey that have procedural due process rights through tenure regarding the tools used…
Descriptors: Principals, Administrator Attitudes, Civil Rights, Public Schools
David Menefee-Libey; Carolyn Herrington; Kyoung-Jun Choi; Julie Marsh; Katrina Bulkley – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2023
COVID-19 upended schooling across the United States, but with what consequences for the state-level institutions that drive most education policy? This paper reports findings on two related research questions. First, what were the most important ways state government education policymakers changed schools and schooling from the moment they began…
Descriptors: State Policy, Educational Policy, COVID-19, Pandemics
Chris Brandt; Carla Evans; Chris Domaleski – National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, 2025
Students need far more than traditional academic skills to succeed in school, work and civic life. Decades of discussion about the knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviors that facilitate success in the information age have produced consensus that students should learn 21st century competencies. However, many schools struggle to meaningfully…
Descriptors: 21st Century Skills, Competence, Integrated Curriculum, Instructional Development
Jennifer A. Bury – ProQuest LLC, 2024
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) cemented a standardized testing assessment culture in the United States but research has highlighted the inequities (Au, 2020; Dixon, 1978; Grodsky et al., 2008; Khan, 2020; Moses & Nanna, 2007), unreliability (Hunt et al., 2010; Pizmony-Levy & Green Saraisky, 2016) and negative impacts (Berryhill et al., 2009;…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Test Validity, Test Reliability, Accountability
Jedemark, Marie; Londos, Mikael – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2021
Various efforts have been made in higher education in Sweden to meet the demand for more transparent governance and increased efficiency and quality. The purpose of this article is to investigate how university teachers handle standardized models for assessment and examination and orientate in this field of tension between professional…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Student Evaluation, Teacher Responsibility, Accountability
Beach, J. M. – Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2021
This book examines the idea of educational accountability in higher education, which has become a new secular gospel. But do accountability policies actually make colleges better? What if educational accountability tools don't actually measure what they're supposed to? What if accountability data isn't valid, or worse, what if it's meaningless?…
Descriptors: Accountability, Higher Education, Educational Policy, Measurement Techniques
Perez, Alexandra Lane; Evans, Carla – Applied Measurement in Education, 2023
New Hampshire's Performance Assessment of Competency Education (PACE) innovative assessment system uses student scores from classroom performance assessments as well as other classroom tests for school accountability purposes. One concern is that not having annual state testing may incentivize schools and teachers away from teaching the breadth of…
Descriptors: Grade 8, Competency Based Education, Evaluation Methods, Educational Innovation
George Leckie; Richard Parker; Harvey Goldstein; Kate Tilling – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2024
School value-added models are widely applied to study, monitor, and hold schools to account for school differences in student learning. The traditional model is a mixed-effects linear regression of student current achievement on student prior achievement, background characteristics, and a school random intercept effect. The latter is referred to…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Value Added Models, Accountability, Institutional Characteristics
López, Daniel A.; Espinoza, Oscar; Rojas, María J.; Crovetto, Mirta – Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 2022
Purpose: This study aims to review processes of accreditation for Chilean Universities. Along with cataloguing evolutionary milestones, the study analyses effects at the institutional and program levels. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopts a meta-evaluative approach and is based on secondary information sources, including both…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Accreditation (Institutions), Higher Education, Institutional Evaluation
Leckie, George; Prior, Lucy – School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2022
School accountability systems increasingly hold schools to account for their performances using value-added models purporting to measure the effects of schools on student learning. The most common approach is to fit a linear regression of student current achievement on student prior achievement, where the school effects are the school means of the…
Descriptors: Value Added Models, Accountability, Secondary Schools, Educational Practices
Lauren Sartain; Wesley T. Morris – AERA Open, 2024
Nationally, teachers have experienced major changes in how their performance is evaluated. Teacher satisfaction with the evaluation system likely influences whether they will use the evaluation data to make instructional improvements, yet we know little about teachers' perceptions of their evaluations. Using survey data from Chicago Public…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Satisfaction, Teacher Evaluation, Public School Teachers
Wong, Wai Yee Amy; Thistlethwaite, Jill; Moni, Karen; Roberts, Chris – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2023
Examiners' judgements play a critical role in competency-based assessments such as objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). The standardised nature of OSCEs and their alignment with regulatory accountability assure their wide use as high-stakes assessment in medical education. Research into examiner behaviours has predominantly explored…
Descriptors: Sociocultural Patterns, Evaluators, Performance Based Assessment, Accountability