NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nunn, Kristen; Vallila-Rohter, Sofia; Middleton, Erica L. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2023
Purpose: Increasingly, mechanisms of learning are being considered during aphasia rehabilitation. Well-characterized learning mechanisms can inform "how" interventions should be administered to maximize the acquisition and retention of treatment gains. This systematic scoping review mapped hypothesized mechanisms of action (MoAs) and…
Descriptors: Aphasia, Rehabilitation, Naming, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Wen Liu – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2024
Automated writing evaluation feedback (AWE) has become popular in writing classrooms. However, few studies have conducted a comprehensive review of the employment of AWE in learning areas. This study aimed to provide a systematic review of the current research on AWE feedback, including its validity, effects, and students' engagement with AWE…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Learner Engagement, Feedback (Response), Teaching Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Thi, Nang Kham; Nikolov, Marianne – TESL-EJ, 2021
With a considerable emphasis on the role of feedback in L2 writing, the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) has been investigated extensively over the past 25 years. Conflicting findings have been reported regarding the efficacy of WCF in developing learners' written accuracy. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of research on…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Lim, See Chen; Renandya, Willy A. – TESL-EJ, 2020
This article takes a meta-analytic approach to investigate the efficacy of written corrective feedback in second language (L2) writing instruction. With its widespread practice in second language acquisition (SLA), written corrective feedback has increasingly garnered attention as much as it has continued to be a subject of considerable…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mohsen, Mohammed Ali – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2022
Written corrective feedback for improving L2 writing skills has been a debatable issue for more than two decades. The aims of this meta-analysis are to (1) provide a quantitative measure of the effect of computer-generated written feedback for improving L2 writing skills and (2) verify how moderators (i.e., adopted technology, task types, and…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Teaching Methods, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lane, Justin D.; Ledford, Jennifer R. – Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 2014
The purpose of this article is to summarize the current literature on the accuracy and reliability of interval systems using data from previously published experimental studies that used either human observations of behavior or computer simulations. Although multiple comparison studies provided mathematical adjustments or modifications to interval…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Literature Reviews, Experiments, Special Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Meng, Yuan-Yuan – Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 2013
Linguistic errors are pervasive in second language (L2) students' writing. Depending on their gravity, the errors may cause a minor degree of irritation to the reader or even lead to total communication breakdown. As such, errors have always been a major concern to both students and teachers, and error correction has also assumed a central…
Descriptors: Written Language, Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Instruction