Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 2 |
| Federal Programs | 2 |
| Growth Models | 2 |
| Academic Standards | 1 |
| Behavioral Objectives | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Educational Indicators | 1 |
| Educational Legislation | 1 |
| Federal Aid | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California (Los Angeles) | 1 |
| Colorado (Denver) | 1 |
| Delaware | 1 |
| District of Columbia | 1 |
| Florida | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| North Carolina (Charlotte) | 1 |
| Texas (Austin) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKatherine E. Castellano; Daniel F. McCaffrey; Joseph A. Martineau – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2025
Growth-to-standard models evaluate student growth against the growth needed to reach a future standard or target of interest, such as proficiency. A common growth-to-standard model involves comparing the popular Student Growth Percentile (SGP) to Adequate Growth Percentiles (AGPs). AGPs follow from an involved process based on fitting a series of…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Growth Models, Student Educational Objectives, Educational Indicators
Download full textICF International, 2010
"Race to the Top"(RTT) asks that states "design and implement rigorous, transparent, and fair evaluation systems for teachers and principals that differentiate effectiveness using multiple rating categories that take into account data on student growth…as a significant factor." In its definition of student growth, RTT makes the…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Aid, Federal Legislation, Federal Programs
