Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Achievement Tests | 9 |
Predictive Validity | 9 |
Elementary School Students | 7 |
Accuracy | 5 |
Reading Tests | 5 |
Screening Tests | 5 |
Classification | 4 |
Grade 3 | 4 |
Reading Fluency | 4 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 3 |
Emergent Literacy | 3 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment for Effective… | 9 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Reports - Research | 8 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 6 |
Early Childhood Education | 5 |
Grade 3 | 5 |
Intermediate Grades | 4 |
Primary Education | 4 |
Grade 2 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 3 |
Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
Measures of Academic Progress | 1 |
Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
Wisconsin Knowledge and… | 1 |
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kayla V. Campaña; Benjamin G. Solomon – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2025
The purpose of this study was to compare the classification accuracy of data produced by the previous year's end-of-year New York state assessment, a computer-adaptive diagnostic assessment ("i-Ready"), and the gating combination of both assessments to predict the rate of students passing the following year's end-of-year state assessment…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Classification, Diagnostic Tests, Adaptive Testing
Thomas, Asia S.; January, Stacy-Ann A. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2021
Educators use universal screening to identify students who may be at risk for not meeting proficiency on the state assessment. Given the potential high-stakes of state tests, using accurate screeners is critical. Independent research is emerging on screeners such as the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP), a computer adaptive test, and the…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Screening Tests, Test Validity, Accuracy
Genareo, Vincent R.; Foegen, Anne; Dougherty, Barbara J.; DeLeeuw, William W.; Olson, Jeannette; Karaman Dundar, Ruveyda – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2021
Although algebra often functions as a gatekeeper to higher-level mathematics courses and higher education admissions, few quality measures exist for assessing conceptual understanding. This study explored the technical adequacy of three procedural and two conceptual algebra screening measures. We administered three rounds of assessments throughout…
Descriptors: Algebra, Screening Tests, Secondary School Mathematics, Mathematics Tests
Ochs, Sarah; Keller-Margulis, Milena A.; Santi, Kristi L.; Jones, John H. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2020
Universal screening is the first mechanism by which students are identified as at risk of failure in the context of multitiered systems of supports. This study examined the validity and diagnostic accuracy of a reading computer-adaptive test as a screener to identify state achievement test performance for third through fifth graders (N = 1,696).…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Accuracy, Reading Tests
Mooney, Paul; Lastrapes, Renée E. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2016
The amount of research evaluating the technical merits of general outcome measures of science and social studies achievement is growing. This study targeted criterion validity for critical content monitoring. Questions addressed the concurrent criterion validity of alternate presentation formats of critical content monitoring and the measure's…
Descriptors: Outcome Measures, Academic Discourse, Benchmarking, Social Studies
Ball, Carrie R.; O'Connor, Edward – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2016
This study examined the predictive validity and classification accuracy of two commonly used universal screening measures relative to a statewide achievement test. Results indicated that second-grade performance on oral reading fluency and the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP), together with special education status, explained 68% of the…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Reading Fluency, Screening Tests, Achievement Tests
Kent, Shawn C.; Wanzek, Jeanne; Yun, Joonmo – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2019
This study examined the predictive validity and classification accuracy of individual- and group-administered screening measures relative to student performance on a year-end state reading assessment in two states. A sample of 321 students was assessed in the areas of word-level and text fluency, as well as reading comprehension in the fall of…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Grade 4, Elementary School Students, At Risk Students
Seethaler, Pamela M.; Fuchs, Lynn S. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2011
The purpose of this study was to examine technical and instructional features of a kindergarten curriculum-based measurement (CBM) tool designed to track students' mathematics progress in terms of computational concepts, procedures, and counting strategies. Students in 10 kindergarten classrooms in three elementary schools completed alternate…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Mathematics Achievement, Achievement Tests, Skill Analysis
Wanzek, Jeanne; Roberts, Greg; Linan-Thompson, Sylvia; Vaughn, Sharon; Woodruff, Althea L.; Murray, Christy S. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2010
The current study examined the predictive validity of oral reading fluency measures across first, second, and third grades for two reading achievement measures at the end of third grade. Oral reading fluency measures were administered to students from first grade to third. The "Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills" and the…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Fluency, Reading Achievement, Predictive Validity