Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Achievement Tests | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Timed Tests | 3 |
Reading Tests | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Business Education | 1 |
Cognitive Ability | 1 |
College Entrance Examinations | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
Educational Testing | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
De Boeck, Paul | 1 |
Goldhammer, Frank | 1 |
Hahnel, Carolin | 1 |
Kroehne, Ulf | 1 |
Lambrecht, Judith J. | 1 |
Li, Dongmei | 1 |
Steedle, Jeffrey | 1 |
Wang, Shichao | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
ACT Assessment | 1 |
Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wang, Shichao; Li, Dongmei; Steedle, Jeffrey – ACT, Inc., 2021
Speeded tests set time limits so that few examinees can reach all items, and power tests allow most test-takers sufficient time to attempt all items. Educational achievement tests are sometimes described as "timed power tests" because the amount of time provided is intended to allow nearly all students to complete the test, yet this…
Descriptors: Timed Tests, Test Items, Achievement Tests, Testing
Goldhammer, Frank; Kroehne, Ulf; Hahnel, Carolin; De Boeck, Paul – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2021
Efficiency in reading component skills is crucial for reading comprehension, as efficient subprocesses do not extensively consume limited cognitive resources, making them available for comprehension processes. Cognitive efficiency is typically measured with speeded tests of relatively easy items. Observed responses and response times indicate the…
Descriptors: Reading Rate, Reading Comprehension, Cognitive Ability, Reading Tests

Lambrecht, Judith J. – Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1978
The article presents results from a comparative analysis of data from tests administered to first- and second-year shorthand students learning three different systems (Century 21, Forkner, and Gregg) in Minneapolis-St. Paul (Minnesota) area high schools. Findings indicate that different shorthand systems should be available for different students.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Business Education, Comparative Analysis, Educational Testing