Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 6 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 6 |
Elementary School Students | 5 |
Grade 5 | 4 |
Reading Tests | 4 |
Achievement Tests | 3 |
Curriculum Based Assessment | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Screening Tests | 3 |
Test Validity | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Assessment for Effective… | 6 |
Author
Ardoin, Scott P. | 1 |
Emily R. Forcht | 1 |
Ethan R. Van Norman | 1 |
Forcht, Emily R. | 1 |
Goodwin, Amanda P. | 1 |
Hulac, David | 1 |
January, Stacy-Ann A. | 1 |
Jones, John H. | 1 |
Jones, Sara | 1 |
Keller-Margulis, Milena A. | 1 |
Lantos, Tess | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 6 |
Grade 5 | 4 |
Intermediate Grades | 4 |
Middle Schools | 4 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Measures of Academic Progress | 2 |
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 1 |
Minnesota Comprehensive… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ethan R. Van Norman; Emily R. Forcht – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2024
Curriculum-based measurement of reading (CBM-R) is a common assessment educators use to monitor student growth in broad reading skills and evaluate the effectiveness of instructional programs. Computer-adaptive tests (CATs), such as Star Reading, have been cited as a viable option to formatively assess reading growth. We used Bayesian…
Descriptors: Reading Improvement, Reading Skills, Reading Achievement, Curriculum Based Assessment
Van Norman, Ethan R.; Forcht, Emily R. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2023
This study explored the validity of growth on two computer adaptive tests, Star Reading and Star Math, in explaining performance on an end-of-year achievement test for a sample of students in Grades 3 through 6. Results from quantile regression analyses indicate that growth on Star Reading explained a statistically significant amount of variance…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Grade Prediction
Goodwin, Amanda P.; Petscher, Yaacov; Tock, Jamie; McFadden, Sara; Reynolds, Dan; Lantos, Tess; Jones, Sara – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2022
Assessment of language skills for upper elementary and middle schoolers is important due to the strong link between language and reading comprehension. Yet, currently few practical, reliable, valid, and instructionally informative assessments of language exist. This study provides validation evidence for Monster, P.I., which is a gamified,…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, Vocabulary
VanMeveren, Kalie; Hulac, David; Wollersheim-Shervey, Sarah – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2020
Reading screening assessments help educators identify students who are at risk of reading and determine the need for intervention and supports. However, some schools screen and assess students more often than needed, and the additional information does not improve the accuracy of decisions. This may be especially true for students at the upper…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Screening Tests, Elementary School Students, High Stakes Tests
Ochs, Sarah; Keller-Margulis, Milena A.; Santi, Kristi L.; Jones, John H. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2020
Universal screening is the first mechanism by which students are identified as at risk of failure in the context of multitiered systems of supports. This study examined the validity and diagnostic accuracy of a reading computer-adaptive test as a screener to identify state achievement test performance for third through fifth graders (N = 1,696).…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Accuracy, Reading Tests
January, Stacy-Ann A.; Ardoin, Scott P. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2015
Curriculum-based measurement in reading (CBM-R) and the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) are assessment tools widely employed for universal screening in schools. Although a large body of research supports the validity of CBM-R, limited empirical evidence exists supporting the technical adequacy of MAP or the acceptability of either measure for…
Descriptors: Curriculum Based Assessment, Achievement Tests, Educational Assessment, Screening Tests