Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Adaptive Testing | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Error of Measurement | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Item Response Theory | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Probability | 1 |
| Psychometrics | 1 |
| Test Bias | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Research and… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGierl, Mark J.; Lai, Hollis; Li, Johnson – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2013
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of CATSIB (Computer Adaptive Testing-Simultaneous Item Bias Test) for detecting differential item functioning (DIF) when items in the matching and studied subtest are administered adaptively in the context of a realistic multi-stage adaptive test (MST). MST was simulated using a 4-item…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Test Bias, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Items
Eggen, Theo J. H. M. – Educational Research and Evaluation, 2011
If classification in a limited number of categories is the purpose of testing, computerized adaptive tests (CATs) with algorithms based on sequential statistical testing perform better than estimation-based CATs (e.g., Eggen & Straetmans, 2000). In these computerized classification tests (CCTs), the Sequential Probability Ratio Test (SPRT) (Wald,…
Descriptors: Test Length, Adaptive Testing, Classification, Item Analysis
