NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)3
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chan, Jeremy – Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 2015
China aims to become an innovation-led nation by 2020, but its leadership is generally sceptical--and oftentimes hostile--to the market forces, open exchange of ideas, and creative destruction that have unlocked innovation in other countries. Instead, Beijing hopes to promote innovation in China through a massive expansion in higher education,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Innovation, Higher Education, Knowledge Economy
Gopalakrishna-Remani, Venugopal – ProQuest LLC, 2012
Timely identification and reporting of rare infectious diseases has important economic, social and health implications. In this study, we investigate how different stakeholders in the existing reporting system influence the timeliness in identification and reporting of rare infectious diseases. Building on the vision of the information supply…
Descriptors: Communicable Diseases, Information Systems, Disease Control, Identification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sasaoka, Yuichi; Nishimura, Mikiko – Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2010
This article critically reflects upon the "divides" among actors within two currently popular education policies in low-income countries: decentralisation and Universal Primary Education (UPE). Current literatures suggest that the existing decentralisation framework tends to overlook the "divides" among actors that often impede…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Governance, Foreign Countries, Accountability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hanson, Mark – Journal of Educational Administration, 1972
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, Comparative Analysis, Decentralization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hoy, Wayne K.; And Others – Journal of Educational Administration, 1983
Using surveys of the professional staffs of 41 secondary schools, this study examines the relationship between two aspects of bureaucratic structure (centralization and formalization) and two sorts of alienation (from work and expressive relations). It then compares the results with similar studies of social studies of social welfare agencies. (JW)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Bureaucracy, Centralization, Comparative Analysis
Heydinger, Richard B.; Norris, Donald M. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1979
Arguments for and against decentralization of data management, analysis, and planning systems are presented. It is suggested that technological advances have encouraged decentralization. Caution in this direction is urged and the development of an articulated decentralization program is proposed. (SF)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, Change Strategies, College Planning
Ryan, Ellen – Currents, 1994
Five college and university fund-raising professionals discuss ways in which uncoordinated solicitations of gifts from the same prospective donor(s) by different schools or departments can be avoided by planning, coordination, and communication. Advantages and disadvantages of centralized and decentralized administrative approaches are considered.…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, Comparative Analysis, Competition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Person, Ruth – Educational Record, 1994
Because colleges and universities have adopted new information technology idiosyncratically, formal structures to manage and govern its use have not evolved at the same pace. In creating such structures, issues to be considered include centralization vs. decentralization, attitudes toward change, institutional diversity, entrepreneurial spirit,…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Administrative Organization, Centralization, College Administration
Estey, Gretta P.; Wilkerson, Steve – Currents, 1994
Both centralized and decentralized college or university development programs have advantages, depending on the nature and needs of the institution. Changing program structure may have consequences that reach far beyond fund-raising details. A survey of 10 institutions revealed some common characteristics and many hybrid forms of organization.…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, College Administration, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grunig, Stephen D. – Journal of Higher Education, 1995
Based on survey data from 70 universities, this study concludes that differences in the organizational structure of development offices have no significant effect on fund-raising efficiency. However, because decentralized offices may be able to expand their activities more rapidly than centralized programs, decentralization may facilitate overall…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, College Administration, Comparative Analysis
PDF pending restoration PDF pending restoration
Lander, Vera L. – 1977
Organization charts from the nine Arizona community college districts were analyzed in order to anticipate the effects of continued growth of the community college system on administrative organization, particularly in terms of the expansion of single campus districts to multi-campus districts and the addition of new campuses by multi-campus…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrators, Centralization, Community Colleges
Bryson, Charles H.; Howard, Richard D. – CAUSE/EFFECT, 1979
The planning processes at two universities are contrasted as they relate to styles of data management and institutional research required to support two different planning philosophies--centralized planning and decentralized planning. (Author/BH)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Case Studies, Centralization, College Planning
Sabo, Sandra R. – Currents, 1994
College and university fund-raising programs that combine some characteristics of centralization and some of decentralization can be very successful and also pose unique administrative challenges, as illustrated in the experiences of a number of diverse institutions. Collaboration and clear communication are keys to effective administration. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Centralization, College Administration, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dingerson, Michael R.; Hill, Margaret – Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1982
A survey of internal research programs shows most are centrally administered with most growth in the private sector. Half spent under $75,000 per year on these programs. Stated program purposes were generally supportive of young researchers and of preliminary research. Administration is most often under academic vice-presidents and graduate…
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrative Policy, Centralization, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Habley, Wesley R. – NACADA Journal, 1997
A national survey on academic advising practices at 754 colleges and universities investigated organizational models for advising programs, prevalence of seven such models in institutions of varying types and sizes, and institutional practices regarding policy statements, program evaluations, and coordination of advising system. Three themes in…
Descriptors: Academic Advising, Administrative Organization, Administrative Policy, Centralization
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2