Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Booth, Ronald R. | 2 |
| Glaub, Gerald R. | 2 |
| Gray, Frank | 2 |
| Lawton, S. B. | 2 |
| Nordvall, Robert C. | 2 |
| Allan, Peter | 1 |
| Allen, Tom | 1 |
| Anderson, B. Robert | 1 |
| Arikado, Marjorie | 1 |
| Bainbridge, William L. | 1 |
| Baker, Michael E. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Location
| Michigan | 3 |
| California | 2 |
| Canada | 2 |
| Illinois | 2 |
| California (Fresno) | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| North Dakota | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
| South Dakota | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
| Wisconsin | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
| Race to the Top | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkZubrzycki, Jaclyn – Education Week, 2013
A growing number of school districts--including large ones like those in Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, and Hawaii--have become recent converts to new principal-evaluation systems that tie school leaders' appraisals to student test scores. As of this school year, student achievement accounts for 40 percent to 50 percent of principals' evaluations…
Descriptors: Principals, Educational Improvement, Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Download full textCenter for American Progress, 2011
School principals are second only to teachers among school-based factors that influence student achievement and they are critical to attracting and retaining effective teachers and other school staff. Yet in the past, federal policymakers haven't given school leadership much attention. This reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Leadership Effectiveness, Principals, Instructional Leadership
Peer reviewedMartin, Jess A. – Special Libraries, 1979
Describes the results of a two-year experiment with subordinates' evaluation of supervisors in a health sciences library, as well as the findings from a questionnaire survey of 101 health sciences library directors on this reverse evaluation. (Author/JD)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Management by Objectives, Medical Libraries, Personnel Evaluation
Frederick County Public Schools, MD. – 1978
The procedure described here--written for the Frederick County Public Schools, Maryland--is an approach to planning, controlling, and evaluating organizational operations that emphasizes objectives and performance standards against which organizational results can be measured. The paper discusses purposes of the work plan and evaluation system,…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Management by Objectives, Planning
Redfern, George B. – 1974
The most formidable obstacle to designing and implementing a workable plan for differentiating the compensation of administrators and supervisors is an inadequate evaluation process. This speech discusses the need for evaluation, examines how widespread are differentiated pay plans for administrative and supervisory personnel, suggests some…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Management by Objectives, Merit Pay
Peer reviewedGray, Frank; Burns, Margaret L. – Educational Leadership, 1979
Management by objectives has not lived up to expectations but still has great potential as a management tool. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Management by Objectives
Peer reviewedIngraham, William W.; Keefe, John E. – School Management, 1972
A program for school administrators involves the establishing of performance goals on a mutual basis with objectives that are measurable and attainable. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Management by Objectives, Management Development
Bainbridge, William L.; Evans, George C. – North Central Association Quarterly, 1982
Describes the REASONS (Responsive, Evaluative Accountability System Operating Newark Schools) program, based on team-oriented management by objectives principles. Reviews REASONS' system for annually defining and refining district missions and system development, unit development, personal growth, and operational objectives, which serve as the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Management by Objectives, Management Systems
Hickcox, Edward S. – 1972
Assessment of senior officials, according to this report, is designed to improve performance in terms of systems objectives. Assessment is defined as the measurement of the distance between performance desired and performance achieved. The author suggests that in developing an evaluative system the school system should first spend a lot of time,…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Selection, Administrators, Boards of Education
Allan, Peter; Rosenberg, Stephen – Personnel Journal, 1978
The authors present guidelines for results-based management appraisal based on a pilot program in New York City government. Included are steps in formulating objectives, standards of accomplishment, and expected results for different types of executive and technical personnel. (MF)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines, Management by Objectives
Peer reviewedHerman, Jerry J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1978
The West Bloomfield School District (Michigan) evaluates administrators by utilizing a management by objectives technique, a comprehensive job description based on tasks to be performed, and a self-evaluation guide that serves as a discussion tool during evaluation conferences. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Management by Objectives, Occupational Information
Arikado, Marjorie; Musella, Donald – OCLEA, 1975
Published quarterly by the Ontario Council for Leadership in Educational Administration, Suite N 1201, 252 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1V5.
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation, Interpersonal Relationship
How to Evaluate Administrative and Supervisory Personnel. Volume IX: AASA Executive Handbook Series.
American Association of School Administrators, Arlington, VA. – 1977
This handbook tells how to identify and afford on-the-job development for administrators and supervisors of a school system or other institution and at the same time how to evaluate them. Developmental performance evaluation, the book says, is similar to Management by Objectives and Program Planning Budgeting Systems and can be used in conjunction…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Administrators, Elementary Secondary Education
PDF pending restorationDePree, Kenneth R. – 1974
In this speech, the author addresses the issue of how school administrators can be formally evaluated. A plan is described for evaluating administrators that has as its primary purpose improving their performance and stimulating their growth. The plan integrates supervision and evaluation; is individualized and consistent with sound educational…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Management by Objectives
Peer reviewedAnderson, B. Robert – School Management, 1973
Each of the 24 administrators brings his concerns to the team for discussion and suggestions. At the request of team members, priorities are set and the individual administrator attacks his own objectives in the most professional manner possible. Inherent in the program are built-in methods for proceeding towards attainable goals, progress checks,…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administration, Administrator Evaluation, Administrators
