NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
ERIC Number: ED575912
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2016
Pages: 137
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 978-1-3696-8304-2
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Evaluating Leadership Frames, Employee Engagement and Retention: A Study of Administrators in Higher Education
Alston, Chandra D.
ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. Dissertation, The University of Memphis
This study was an examination of administrators in higher education organizations in the State of Tennessee. The administrators identified their supervisors' leadership style. The supervisor's leadership style was used to evaluate the administrators' level of engagement and intent to stay (retention). To describe the supervisors' leadership style, the researcher employed Lee G. Bolman and Terrence E. Deal's Leadership Orientations Instrument (LOI; Other; 1991b); engagement level was measured using the A. B. Bakker and W.B. Schaufeli's Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES; 2003). Retention was gauged by how long the administrators planned to remain in their position. A survey instrument was designed to collect information from higher education administrators. Data were drawn from the four sections of the survey. Section 1 collected demographic data; Section 2 was made up of Bolman and Deal's LOI (Other); Section 3 contained the UWES to assess the respondent's level of vigor, level of dedication, and level of absorption. Section 4 dealt with the respondent's intent to stay (retention). Respondents included 445 higher education administrators divided into five groups: 1) top executive and senior institutional officers; 2) academic deans; 3) institutional administrators; 4) heads of divisions, departments, and centers; and 5) academic associate and assistant deans. The results of the study, as measured by the data gathered from the survey instrument, indicate that there is a statistically significant relationship between leadership style and engagement. Thus, leadership style did predict engagement. The structural leadership style had the strongest relationship with all the elements of engagement followed by the human resource leadership style. The political style had a significant relationship with the absorption aspect of engagement. Leadership style did not predict retention in this study. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Higher Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Tennessee
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A