Descriptor
Source
Reading Improvement | 5 |
Author
Fitzpatrick, Karen | 1 |
Jenkins, Stephen J. | 1 |
Rupley, William | 1 |
Stephens, James C., Jr. | 1 |
Treat, Janet | 1 |
Tunnell, Michael O. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Georgia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Stephens, James C., Jr.; Jenkins, Stephen J. – Reading Improvement, 1994
Examines relationships between implementation of select affective middle school program elements and criterion-based student achievement in math, reading, and writing. Finds strong relationships among the achievement measures used and between school articulation strategies and the achievement measures. Suggests some affective program elements…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Affective Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Research

Treat, Janet – Reading Improvement, 1977
Shows why self-concept is important in reading instruction, and why reading teachers should use effective classroom techniques to promote self-concept. (RL)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Affective Objectives, Educational Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education

Fitzpatrick, Karen – Reading Improvement, 1977
Shows that strategies designed to help students identify their personal values improved students' self-concepts and reading achievements. (RL)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Affective Objectives, Change Agents, Change Strategies

Tunnell, Michael O.; And Others – Reading Improvement, 1988
Reports on a study to develop and test a short form reading attitude survey which could be readily used by classroom teachers. Results showed that most students hold favorable attitudes toward reading, and that the survey is reliable, quick, and simple to use. (RAE)
Descriptors: Affective Objectives, Cognitive Ability, Elementary Education, Grade 2

Rupley, William – Reading Improvement, 1977
Recommends that effective reading instruction be evaluated by comparing actual and expected reading growth, identifying effective teaching techniques, using research methodology that creates better understanding rather than design sophistication, and considering both the cognitive and affective dimensions of reading instruction. (RL)
Descriptors: Affective Objectives, Cognitive Objectives, Instructional Improvement, Predictor Variables