Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
| Age Differences | 3 |
| Generational Differences | 3 |
| Older Adults | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Age Groups | 1 |
| Aging (Individuals) | 1 |
| Attention | 1 |
| Attitude Measures | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computer Mediated… | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Gerontology | 3 |
Author
| Gilani, Jia | 1 |
| Liu, Chih-Chi | 1 |
| Malter, Johnna | 1 |
| Neiterman, Elena | 1 |
| Sheppard, Christine L. | 1 |
| Stapley, Janice C. | 1 |
| Van Volkom, Michele | 1 |
| Wang, Ya-Ling | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Taiwan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSheppard, Christine L.; Gilani, Jia; Neiterman, Elena – Educational Gerontology, 2022
Experiential learning and reflection activities are often used to enhance students' understanding of and attitudes toward aging; however, deep reflection is difficult to achieve, and research shows students demonstrate varying abilities to reflect. This study examined the extent to which students in a third-year gerontology course were able to…
Descriptors: Reflection, Experiential Learning, Student Attitudes, Aging (Individuals)
Liu, Chih-Chi; Wang, Ya-Ling – Educational Gerontology, 2023
Research has begun to pay more attention to intergenerational learning and its advantages, while what is the flow state of students of different generations when they participate in intergenerational learning? This study simultaneously measured the flow state of 16 college students (M = 23.13, SD = 1.82, ranging from 21 to 27 years old; 23.08%…
Descriptors: In Person Learning, Electronic Learning, Models, Age Groups
Van Volkom, Michele; Stapley, Janice C.; Malter, Johnna – Educational Gerontology, 2013
A community sample of 431 adults (175 men and 256 women) ages 18 to 91 across three generations (young adults, adults, and older adults) were recruited for the current study. Participants completed a demographic and technology use questionnaire that ascertained their attitudes toward, and use of, various types of technology--such as cellular…
Descriptors: Adults, Gender Differences, Generational Differences, Age Differences
