To test the belief that good designers are the best judges of architectural design, 27 architecture students rated 15 architectural designs by other students. Instructors' ratings were criteria. As predicted, good student designers were not more accurate than poor student designers; average students were most accurate. (Author/SJL)

Some data on sex and handedness in relation to academic predictors and success in architectural education were reexamined. The new variable was the notion of visual thinking, measured by the manner, "visually" or "cognitively," of executing a simple line drawing. As expected, significant differences appeared between persons using these modes.…

Design projects by senior architecture students were critiqued by a faculty jury to see if students' judgment of their own work gained in accuracy after criticism and if good students judged themselves more accurately than average or poor students. Student reactions to the jury experience were also studied. (SJL)