Descriptor
Armed Forces | 4 |
Military Personnel | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Military Service | 2 |
Academic Education | 1 |
Advertising | 1 |
Aptitude | 1 |
Aptitude Tests | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Educational Background | 1 |
Educational Opportunities | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Vitola, Bart M. | 4 |
Brokaw, Leland D. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Armed Services Vocational… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Vitola, Bart M.; Brokaw, Leland D. – 1973
The study characterizes the 1971 enlistees by relating their education, race, age, and test performance to their perceived draft vulnerability as high, moderate, or low draft pressure, or not eligible for the draft, and comparing them to the 1970 accessions. It was found that the 1971 accessions demonstrated less aptitude and were less…
Descriptors: Academic Education, Armed Forces, Comparative Analysis, Military Personnel
Validity of Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, Form 1, to Predict Technical School Success.
Vitola, Bart M.; And Others – 1973
Validities of the four aptitude indexes of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB), Form 1, and the Airman Qualifying Examination-66 (AQE), were determined for final grades in 46 airman training courses. Comparisons were made between AQE and ASVAB in terms of their ability to predict technical school success. The data demonstrate…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Armed Forces, Military Personnel, Predictive Measurement
Vitola, Bart M.; And Others – 1976
The study was conducted to determine if the Air Force has been able to sustain the quality of its force during 1973-74 as compared to 1972, the last year of the Selective Service Draft Lottery System. Data were collected on male and female non-prior service basic trainees who enlisted in the Air Force in 1972 (4,688 females and 81,563 males), 1973…
Descriptors: Aptitude, Armed Forces, Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis
Vitola, Bart M. – 1974
The Airman Enlistment Questionnaire was administered to a sample of non prior service enlistees, 1,667 males and 300 females. Analysis of the responses shows (1)educational opportunity is the strongest motivator for enlisting in the Air Force; (2) there is an indication that Air Force advertising should make different appeals to men and women; and…
Descriptors: Advertising, Armed Forces, Educational Opportunities, Females