Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 2 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 9 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 27 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 8 |
| Postsecondary Education | 5 |
| Adult Education | 4 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
| Two Year Colleges | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 5 |
| Australia | 4 |
| California | 3 |
| Florida | 3 |
| Michigan | 3 |
| New York | 3 |
| Ohio | 3 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 3 |
| Canada | 2 |
| Germany | 2 |
| Indiana | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
| Workforce Investment Act 1998 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Myers Briggs Type Indicator | 2 |
| Diagnostic Interview Schedule… | 1 |
| Graduate Record Examinations | 1 |
| Miller Analogies Test | 1 |
| National Teacher Examinations | 1 |
| Personal Report of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedShilling, Joseph L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
The Maryland Assessment Center Program (MACP), conducted in cooperation with the NASSP Assessment Center Project, consists of a Commission on School-Based Administration to review principal selection and training processes, a statewide assessment program, and a Research and Development Laboratory on School Based Administration at the University of…
Descriptors: Administrator Education, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Qualifications, Administrator Selection
Bratton, Barry – Performance and Instruction, 1984
Discussion of the development of a list of certification competencies for instructional designers by National Society for Performance and Instruction's Standards Committee and Association for Educational Communications and Technology's Division of Instructional Development includes precepts on which competencies are based, ways list will be…
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Certification, Competence
Peer reviewedMilstein, Mike; Fiedler, Celia Karen – Urban Education, 1989
Research demonstrates that centers sanctioned by the National Association of Secondary School Principals to assess the job-related proficiency behavior of administrators and candidates for administrative positions generate a significant amount of valuable information about them, have an acceptable level of validity, and are cost-effective. (BJV)
Descriptors: Administrator Qualifications, Administrators, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Competence
Peer reviewedVavrus, Linda G.; Collins, Angelo – Teacher Education Quarterly, 1991
Describes the research of Stanford University's Teacher Assessment Project which studied alternative modes of performance-based assessments for potential use in licensing and certifying teachers. The article discusses how researchers combined assessment center exercises and portfolio development to create a new form of assessment center…
Descriptors: Assessment Centers (Personnel), Elementary Secondary Education, Knowledge Level, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewedKing, Bruce – Teacher Education Quarterly, 1991
Stanford University's Teacher Assessment Project (TAP) explored new modes of teacher assessment designed to reflect the richness and complexity of teaching. The article discusses TAP's creation, administration, and evaluation of assessment center exercises based on documents teachers submitted in portfolios that included their plans, activities,…
Descriptors: Assessment Centers (Personnel), Elementary Secondary Education, Knowledge Level, Performance Based Assessment
Download full textInternational Personnel Management Association, Washington, DC. – 1986
The International Association of Personnel Management Assessment Council (IPMAAC) is a section of the International Association of Personnel Management devoted to individuals involved in professional level public personnel assessment. Author-generated summaries/outlines of papers presented at the IPMAAC's 1986 conference are provided. The…
Descriptors: Assessment Centers (Personnel), Evaluation Methods, Job Analysis, Job Performance
Fleenor, John W.; And Others – 1990
During the past 30 years, assessment centers have become an increasingly popular method for evaluating employees and potential employees in work organizations. This study was conducted to evaluate an assessment center which was part of a management development program for state government employees. The study examined: (1) whether assessment…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrators, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Career Development
Butler, Richard P.; And Others – 1984
The purpose of this report is to describe, evaluate, and validate a pilot assessment center (AC) established in the Center for Leadership and Personal Development at the U.S. Military Academy to develop cadets on job skills needed by newly commissioned officers in the U.S. Army. The AC programs employ a leadership evaluation development method…
Descriptors: Assessment Centers (Personnel), Higher Education, Leadership Qualities, Leadership Training
Kandelman, Harriet A. – 1985
Concerned with providing managerial assessment centers with oral communication criteria against which communication apprehension may be measured, the convergent validity of the Personal Report of Communication Apprehension--Organization Form (PRCA-OF) was tested against 23 raters' scores in five one-day developmental assessment centers. The…
Descriptors: Affective Measures, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Communication Apprehension, Communication Research
Peer reviewedDelon, Floyd G. – West's Education Law Reporter, 1988
The most likely legal challenge to assessment centers is racial discrimination. Although validation studies have shown the assessment center to be job related and no equally effective alternative to be available, futher validation will be needed with each new application of assessment centers in certification and employment decisions. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Qualifications, Administrators, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Court Litigation
Peer reviewedFields, Joseph C.; Carrick, Charles F. – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
Thirteen ideas for marketing and implementing the assessment center concept are presented. These call for a primary focus on individuals and on excellence, preparation and organization, assessor training, assessor newsletters, accessible locations, a statewide advisory board, an action plan, confidentiality, both causal and formal meetings,…
Descriptors: Administrator Education, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Selection, Assessment Centers (Personnel)
Peer reviewedPritchett, JoAnn H. – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
A principal and assessor for an Alabama school system describes the professional benefits of her experience with the NASSP Assessment Center Project: peer interaction, informal exchanges, and close personal contact with five other practicing administrators. (TE)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Education, Administrator Evaluation, Assessment Centers (Personnel)
Chen, Hsin-Chih; Naquin, Sharon S. – Online Submission, 2005
Construct validity has been an issue in assessment centers literature. This study developed a model for competency-based assessment centers by integrating competency modeling, training design, assessment centers, and multi-source feedback assessment. Several propositions in conjunction with the model were also developed to help resolve construct…
Descriptors: Validity, Construct Validity, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Competence
Peer reviewedRinehart, Susan Hodson; Smith, Keith – Journal of Agricultural Education, 1994
The performance of 16 Ohio county commissioners in an assessment center simulation was rated by themselves and 6 center evaluators. Real-life performance was rated by the commissioners and 15 county extension chairs. Commissioners' performance in the simulation was rated well above average by evaluators, and chairs rated real-life performance even…
Descriptors: Administrator Effectiveness, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Role, Assessment Centers (Personnel)
Peer reviewedWilliams, John; Pantili, Linda – Journal of School Leadership, 1992
Summarizes a study using a series of meta-analyses to integrate the factors identified within and outside of the NASSP assessment center process into a consistent theoretical framework for improving principal preparation, assessment, selection, and performance. Proposes a model for future assessment center programs based on this analysis.…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Selection, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Elementary Secondary Education
