NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trehub, Sandra E.; And Others – Child Development, 1987
Infants were tested for their discrimination of changes in the melodic contour (direction of successive pitch changes) of brief melodies in the context of discernible variations in key or interval size. (PCB)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Auditory Tests, Infants
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Werner, Lynne A.; And Others – Child Development, 1992
Assessed auditory temporal acuity among infants of 3, 6, and 12 months of age and adults. Gap detection thresholds were quite poor in infants. Effects of restricting the range of frequencies available for detecting gaps were qualitatively similar for infants and adults. (GLR)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Auditory Perception, Auditory Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fuller, Peter W.; And Others – Child Development, 1981
Determines whether an averaged evoked potential technique using a random-v-repetitive presentation mode could be used to study infant auditory discrimination. Results showed a main effect of presentation mode with shorter latency for random v repetitive. The shortest onset latency was for random stimulus at the fast rate. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Attention Span, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Auditory Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davis, Sylvia M.; McCroskey, Robert L. – Child Development, 1980
Focuses on auditory fusion (defined in terms of a listerner's ability to distinguish paired acoustic events from single acoustic events) in 3- to 12-year-old children. The subjects listened to 270 pairs of tones controlled for frequency, intensity, and duration. (CM)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ashmead, Daniel H.; And Others – Child Development, 1991
One experiment determined that the minimum angle at which infants can discriminate 2 sound presentations decreases substantially toward 48 weeks of age. In 3 succeeding experiments, infants aged 16, 20, and 28 weeks were able to discriminate sounds presented to each ear between 50 and 75 microseconds apart. (BC)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Auditory Tests, Hearing (Physiology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mohan, Philip J. – Child Development, 1975
The encoding processes of poor and average readers were compared in a short-term memory task. Since poor readers have difficulty in integrating audiovisual input, it was hypothesized that this pattern may be due to inadequate acoustic encoding. The results did not support the hypothesis. (Author/CS)
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wightman, Frederic; And Others – Child Development, 1989
The auditory temporal resolving power of young children was measured using an adaptive forced choice psycho-physical paradigm that was disguised as a video game. (PCB)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Attention, Auditory Discrimination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bryden, M. P. – Child Development, 1972
Matched groups of good and poor readers were administered a task that involved making same-different judgments for various combinations of auditory sequential, visual sequential, and visual spatial patterns. (Author)
Descriptors: Auditory Tests, Elementary School Students, Pattern Recognition, Performance Factors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vande Voort, Lewis; And Others – Child Development, 1972
The results fail to support the hypothesis that intersensory integration is the sole or even the primary developmental skill accounting for matching task improvement with increasing age. The hypothesis that retarded readers fail to develop skills in intersensory integration is also not supported. (Authors)
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Auditory Tests, Data Analysis, Developmental Tasks